On Dec. 24, the government announced that due to China’s suppression of Taiwan’s national dignity when it came to the US$1 million donation to the WHO to assist the fight against the Ebola virus, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs suspended the donation after failing to reach an agreement with the WHO, despite more than seven months of negotiations.
Taiwan has made several similar donations to major partners in the field of global health, and they made a positive impact.
For instance, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria was established in 2002. Taiwan in 2002 and 2004 donated US$1 million to it in the name of “the people of Taiwan” and the “Health Authorities of Taiwan,” respectively, with the purpose of assisting the WHO and international society to tackle the three major infectious diseases.
However, in a retrospective manner, China has vehemently suppressed and been extremely hostile toward Taiwan’s aid donations and even its acceptance of other country’s donations.
For example: After the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Chinese journalist Kong Chien (孔建), on a TV Asahi program, claimed that donations from Taiwan should be counted as donations from China; in the aftermath of the Hualien earthquake last year, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs even condemned Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe for expressing his condolences to Taiwan; and the day after the 921 earthquake in 1999, which was an even greater disaster than last year’s, the Red Cross Society of China demanded that any country wanting to provide relief funds or aid to Taiwan should acquire China’s consent.
All in all, except for those incidents, China has merely turned a deaf ear to injuries and casualties among Taiwanese.
A few days ago, when President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) responded to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “spiritual union” statement, she said that the urgent African swine fever epidemic, the conduct of pressuring international corporations to change their designation of Taiwan and buying up Taiwan’s diplomatic allies would not bring about a spiritual union across the Taiwan Strait.
China’s forcible suppression in recent years of any chance for Taiwan to make meaningful contributions to global health will not only drive Taiwanese further away, but it is unlikely to bring any benefits to the well-being of Taiwanese and Chinese, and it could even pose a huge threat to global health security.
On the other hand, Taiwan has diligently fulfilled its obligations as a global citizen and dedicated itself to strengthening epidemic prevention networks with like-minded countries at both the regional and international levels.
As China cannot even be bothered to act as a “like-minded” partner of Taiwan, on what grounds can Xi support the blatant claim that there is what he calls a “spiritual union” across the Taiwan Strait?
On Thursday next week, the WHO is to hold its 144th executive board meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. The meeting is to focus on the eradication of polio and tuberculosis, as well as the fight against antibiotic resistance.
If the WHO truly intends to become a so-called “global health leader,” then instead of ignoring Taiwan’s willingness and right to participate in and contribute to global health, it should promote more transnational cooperation and resource investments to achieve the goal of universal health coverage, which has been pursued by the WHO, so that everyone can have access to essential health services.
As African swine fever-infected pig carcasses from China have reached the shores of Kinmen County, it suffices to say that an outbreak of the epidemic is likely to happen in Taiwan soon.
Therefore, we strongly appeal to the director-general of the WHO and health professionals all over the world to not give countenance to China for extending its unreasonable political oppression to the field of the rights to health, which will only continue to bring irrecoverable losses for global health.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan and a former legislator.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under