It has been another year of relentless artificial intelligence (AI) hype and incremental achievement. Machines still beat humans only in carefully constructed environments or at narrow tasks.
The good news is that, as the technology progresses, the race for leadership is still wide open, and even Europe, where politicians fret that the continent is lagging behind China and the US, is still quite competitive.
According to the Artificial Intelligence Index 2018 annual report, whose steering committee includes leading AI academics such as Yoav Shoham of Stanford University and Erik Brynjolfsson of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, AI has progressed on all the measures tracked.
Some of the metrics, from the number of published papers and conference attendance, to mentions on corporate earnings calls and in parliamentary hearings, measure the hype. Others reflect improving performance.
Last year, AI became more accurate and much faster at image detection. It also improved at parsing the grammatical structure of sentences, answering multiple-choice questions and translation. Whether this progress brings us closer to truly superhuman AI is a different matter.
On the translation front, a measure called “Bilingual Evaluation Understudy” is used to determine accuracy. It compares machine-translated sentences to those rendered by human experts.
Last year, almost half the machine translations between English and German news articles measured up to the human ones. Microsoft announced with much fanfare that its AI did just as well as humans in translating news from Chinese into English.
However, the underlying paper reports much lower scores for the Chinese translations than for the separately published German ones, and accuracy scores from human evaluators of between 50 percent and 70 percent.
Machine-translation algorithms still produce plenty of gibberish and are really mostly useful, in a limited way, to humans with some understanding of both languages and the context.
Improved image recognition has worked wonders in some fields of medicine. For example, Google has developed a system for grading prostate cancer that is more accurate than US pathologists and a Stanford team has achieved similar success with skin cancer.
Where lots of data exist and precision is valued, AI can help humans make better decisions, even though it still messes up regularly when trained on biased data sets or is intentionally tricked. Humans are less prone to misidentifying objects and are better able to correct for their biases.
Data mining and question-answering skills can make AI appear almost human at times. Last year, IBM presented the current iteration of its “Project Debater,” which tries to debate humans hewing to the rules of such competitions. The exercise looks impressive — the machine instantaneously gathers and orders information, packs it into grammatically correct sentences and inserts prewritten jokes almost in the correct places.
However, as an AI expert who was present discovered, it tended merely to repeat its points in response to arguments.
While the idea of having a machine take part in brainstorms is exciting, “we are most certainly not on the verge of seeing AI systems out-debating their human counterparts,” wrote the expert, Chris Reed of the University of Dundee in Scotland. “Today’s AI technology is as far from these scenarios as the Romans’ experiments with steam power were from the industrial revolution.”
As often happens with technological advancement, AI gets too much attention too early.
However, if in previous years some AI academics grumbled that the hype might impede progress, because people would become disappointed in the unfulfilled promise of a shiny toy, attention to AI has become too sustained and the financial and intellectual resources thrown at it too enormous for that to happen. Now, competing in AI is a matter of prestige for major nations.
So far, the US, Europe and China all have their strengths. Data in the Artificial Intelligence Index showed the US as the runaway leader in patents; along with China, it leads in the number of papers submitted to and accepted by major AI conferences.
However, it is in Europe where the greatest number of AI papers (28 percent of the total, compared with 25 percent for China and 17 percent for the US) are published.
A report published by the European Commission’s Joint Research Center last month said that the EU is home to one-quarter of the approximately 35,000 entities working on AI today, compared with 28 percent for the US and 23 percent for China.
Europe also matches competitors when it comes to AI adoption in business, especially in process automation, global management consulting firm McKinsey & Co said.
This is likely to come as a surprise to European leaders, especially German and French ones, who often talk about falling behind.
Last month, German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy Peter Altmaier supported the idea of a pan-European state-led corporation, along the lines of Airbus, to compete in AI.
Europe does not really need massive state interference to catch up, as it did in the 1960s and 1970s when Boeing dominated the aircraft industry. However, the EU and governments in North America and China will be pouring more resources into AI in the coming years, and distinct development models are likely to crystallize in the key competing countries as regulation follows the money.
The Joint Research Center report named three approaches that are easy to match to their regions of origin: “AI for profit,” “AI for control” and “AI for society,” a discipline it defines as “a human-centered, ethical and secure approach.”
Regardless of how well the technology will eventually work, major nations have already co-opted it for soft power and ideological competition. It is a rerun of last century’s space race, not seen in this pure a form for many decades.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations