Many Taiwanese are so busy just trying to make a living that they do not care much about politics. You often hear people say that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are “both the same.”
This makes it easy for those with vested interests in the KMT to hoodwink voters who are too lazy to think for themselves. Actually, the two parties are very different.
Last month’s local government elections made the differences between the two parties more obvious than ever. The DPP is not afraid to admit its faults. Acknowledging its electoral losses, the party chairperson immediately accepted full responsibility and resigned.
In contrast, some highly vocal single-issue groups that do not think that reform offends those with vested interests actually blame the government for not reforming hard enough.
The KMT cannot be expected to reveal the main reason for its electoral victories, but it has given the game away by rewarding those who helped it win. “Rehabilitated offenders” from local factions have been floating to the surface.
When one of them was revealed to have been found criminally negligent in a traffic accident, others defended him, saying that “saints are hard to find.”
The KMT is full of corrupt elements and it has plenty of “rehabilitated offenders.” The KMT chairman has even been traveling with “rehabilitees.” It would be quite accurate to rename the KMT “the rehab party.”
Civic groups, whose focus is “reform,” are different from local gang leaders with a long criminal record of corruption. While civic groups lack local roots, local factions are deeply embedded, and they are still manipulated by the KMT.
Civic groups like to let everyone have their say. They see “unity” as a dirty word and besmirch it as “royalism.”
Professional associations and local gang leaders unite when necessary to protect their interests, but they do not boast about it.
In party politics, you cannot win elections without unity. The KMT ruled Taiwan for a long time by sowing division among Taiwanese and dangwai (outside the party, 黨外) opposition groups.
When some people who want to stand for election as party chairperson say that unity is “royalism,” they are living in cloud cuckoo land. The royalism of Qing Dynasty reformer Liang Qichao (梁啟超) was about preserving the imperial system, but in a democracy there is no imperial system to keep. Dilettantes like them should not imagine that they are revolutionaries like Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
Talk of “radical transformation” is just that — empty talk that avoids reality.
When President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) resigned as DPP chairperson, it implied that the DPP was becoming less like the KMT and more like US parties. In the US, with its presidential system, the chairpersons of parties’ national committees are only responsible for organizing and raising funds for the electoral machine.
US presidents do not serve as the chairpersons of their parties and party chairpersons do not stand in presidential elections.
If the DPP became more like US parties, its party chairperson would devote their efforts to organizing and putting down local roots, and seeking harmony between civic groups and vocal local conservatives.
After letting people in the party have their say, the DPP must unite to fight the KMT’s corrupt local factions. If it does that, the differences between the two parties would become even more stark.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Julian Clegg
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented