Financial digitalization — the digital revolution’s system-level transformation of the entire financial ecosystem — could catalyze global efforts to finance sustainable development.
According to the McKinsey Global Institute, the expanded use of financial technology (fintech) could drive growth across developing countries by up to US$3.7 trillion by 2025, thanks mainly to increased productivity gains and broader financial inclusion.
However, if the promises of digitalization are to be fulfilled, the world will need to align financing and investment strategies more tightly to sustainable development outcomes.
Last month, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres convened a task force on digital financing to tackle this complex challenge. We are honored to serve as cochairs for this global effort.
For obvious reasons, financing is key to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and meeting the emissions targets set by the 2015 Paris Agreement.
However, although global savings are more than adequate to fuel the transition to sustainable development, the global financial system has so far failed to effectively intermediate supply and demand. The modest success that some countries have achieved in financing sustainable development has not been commensurate with the need.
Many factors can influence sustainable development outcomes. For example, the global financial and economic crises that began in 2008 — and the subsequent responses by regulators and policymakers — have impacted economic growth, job creation and income equality.
Likewise, ventures such as China’s Belt and Road Initiative can unlock fresh funds for infrastructure investment. Any number of national and international policies can determine whether financing delivers, or diverts us from, sustainable development.
However, it is digitalization that could make the biggest long-term difference by harnessing the power of new business models driven by technologies, including mobile connectivity, artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain and the Internet of Things.
However, that immense potential is not guaranteed. Ultimately, the impact of digitalization on sustainable development will depend on whether the advent of more and cheaper data, together with faster analytics, results in financing decisions that take greater account of today’s social and environmental costs.
Fintech can place citizens center stage in delivering good development outcomes.
Kenya’s digital revolution has helped poor households gain access to everything from solar energy to government bond markets. Crowdfunding platforms such as the UK’s Abundance, Germany’s EcoCrowd and Japan’s NPO Bank are unlocking responsible, sustainable lending solutions. In China, Ant Financial’s Ant Forest platform has helped more than 300 million people reduce their ecological footprint. Bicycle-sharing services use app-based fintech payment solutions to make their low-carbon, healthier transportation option available to millions of people in cities all over the world.
In short, there are already tantalizing hints of the power of the digital revolution in advancing finance for sustainability.
Changing how people bank and invest, and democratizing access to the financial system is essential to spurring development more broadly.
According to the UN Capital Development Fund, financial inclusion for the unbanked and underserved is a direct enabler for at least eight of the SDGs.
The challenge is to think and act systemically: to extrapolate from retail-level examples to consider how digitalization can align the financial system to sustainable development; how investors identify, analyze and mitigate risk; how capital markets move; and how policymakers and regulators approach their work.
The problem is that most solutions are fragmented and narrowly focused, while issues that pose an existential threat to humanity — such as climate change — are largely external to most financing decisions.
Domestic savings are not being channeled to fund sustainable infrastructure. Illicit financial flows continue to drain development resources. Sustainable financing for biodiversity remains virtually ignored by the fintech revolution, and even financial inclusion — where fintech has had the biggest development impact to date — has a long way to go in reducing poverty and inequality.
These are just a few of the challenges our task force will study. Our membership includes tech entrepreneurs, bank CEOs, civil society leaders, international standard-setters, capital markets experts, central bank governors, finance and economic ministers, and heads of UN agencies.
Throughout next year, we will work closely with established and emerging leaders to analyze the issues, identify opportunities and make recommendations to ensure that the transformations being wrought by financial digitalization will be ones that ultimately benefit the planet and its people.
We begin our work next month and aim to present our initial set of findings in September.
As Guterres said last month when he announced the launch of the task force, digital technology “can be a game changer” in delivering progress on the SDGs.
With leadership and policy guidance, the digitalization of financing can open up roles for empowered citizens to shape the future of the real economy. The focus must be on seizing this disruptive opportunity to ensure that the finance system fulfills its potential to support inclusive, sustainable development.
Maria Ramos is CEO of Absa Group Ltd. Achim Steiner is administrator of the UN Development Programme.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs