The world is mired in a serious, if underreported, crisis. Every year, humans generate nearly 2 billion tonnes of household waste, and much more industrial, hazardous, electronic, medical and construction waste, much of which is disposed of inadequately.
As usual, the consequences — environmental destruction, damage to health and impeded development — are disproportionately affecting the world’s poor.
As it stands, at least one-third of all global waste is openly dumped or burned. In low-income countries, which might already spend as much of 20 percent of their municipal budgets on waste management, that figure can rise as high as 93 percent.
The damage to human health and the environment is already profound.
For example, each year, the world generates 220 million tonnes of plastic, which comprises as much as 90 percent of ocean debris, damaging the marine ecosystem and ending up in our own bodies.
According to Ocean Conservancy, plastic has been found in every species of sea turtle and more than 25 percent of fish sampled from seafood markets around the world.
The problem is set to worsen. The What a Waste 2.0 report projects that annual global waste generation will increase by as much as 70 percent by 2050, even as the world’s population grows by less than half that.
Half of the increase will come from Sub-Saharan Africa, where waste generation will more than triple, and South Asia, where it will more than double.
Confronting the escalating waste crisis will be crucial to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development commits countries to achieving sustainable production and consumption patterns (SDG No. 12). It also calls for universal access to clean water and sanitation (SDG No. 6), and the creation of healthy and sustainable cities (SDG No. 11).
SDG No. 14 — “conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development” — obviously cannot be achieved without major progress in fighting marine pollution.
Fortunately, the world finally seems to be recognizing the scale of the waste crisis. October’s Our Ocean Conference in Bali, Indonesia, focused on generating commitments and formulating measures to maintain ocean sustainability, including by cutting marine pollution. In particular, there has been a surge in bans or taxes imposed on certain plastics or plastic products.
However, addressing the issue of plastic consumption still requires far-reaching behavioral change.
At the same time, the plastic waste that is produced needs to be managed better to prevent it from ending up in waterways.
Given that larger countries make the biggest contributions to plastic pollution, improving waste management there will have a major impact.
Where regulations to prevent dumping are insufficient, they should be strengthened and enforced.
There are already numerous successful models of waste management and disposal that might provide a useful starting point for such changes.
Forward-thinking action will also be critical in countries anticipating rapid economic and/or population growth, such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India, Nigeria and Pakistan.
Of course, such changes cost money, which is often in short supply. On average, local governments pay half of countries’ costs for solid waste management. Although lower-income countries spend less on waste management in absolute terms, they have a harder time recovering costs.
Given this, international institutions should help countries — especially lower-income countries — plan and develop state-of-the-art waste-management systems, including by providing needed financing.
In Morocco, the government with the help of international loans implemented a program that transformed solid waste management, including by considerably boosting private-sector participation.
International institutions should also support the introduction of policies that create incentives for reducing household waste.
Here, again, there are successful models to emulate: In Ningbo, China, citizens receive a financial incentive to separate organic waste and recyclables, reducing the city’s overall cost of collection.
Effective waste mitigation requires action at all levels of government and society. This means securing broad-based behavioral change, aligning incentives, reducing barriers to financing and promoting private-sector participation.
It also means providing support to the countries that need it most, such as those in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.
A cleaner, healthier future is within reach. We must not let it go to waste.
Mahmoud Mohieldin is World Bank Group senior vice president for the 2030 development agenda, UN relations and partnerships, and is a former Egyptian minister of investment. Sameh Wahba is global director for urban and territorial development, disaster risk management and resilience at the World Bank. Silpa Kaza is an urban development specialist in the World Bank’s Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under