In last month’s elections, the traditional Taiwanese independence camp campaigned actively against the re-election of Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and threw its support behind a pro-independence mayoral candidate in the south. Both candidates lost. The pro-independence camp has lost its momentum and is worsening with time.
Overseas Taiwanese who think that support for independence remains strong are wrong. In their eyes, anyone who identifies as Taiwanese rather than Chinese supports formal independence, but in reality, such people only agree that Taiwan is a country and pay no attention to the political climate.
The traditional independence camp was formed under the dictatorship of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). At that time, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime had colonized Taiwan and ruled it through the Republic of China (ROC) government. The independence movement wanted to overturn the ROC.
While overseas Taiwanese advocated independence, the domestic independence movement remained part of the democracy movement, as the Chiang family’s approach to independence supporters and communists was that it would rather kill 100 than let one get away.
Following democratization, Taiwanese joined the ROC establishment and participated in the government, but Chinese forces opposed this participation, which is how anti-communism developed into a pro-China stance and an alliance with the enemy to deal with the Taiwanese.
Many people in the independence movement have changed from working to overturn the ROC to opposing annexation by China, and although many overseas Taiwanese also oppose annexation, their focus remains on overturning the ROC.
During the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) years and the early years after the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was formed, politicians were respectful of members of the independence movement, because the public treated them as heroes and they were quite influential during elections.
However, their influence has waned, and by last month’s elections, Taipei Ko had decimated any remaining influence. That is because the public no longer thinks of independence advocates as heroes.
In the past, anyone who dared criticize the KMT government became a hero. Taiwanese at the time were being persecuted. While most were furious, they were afraid to speak up, and so they admired the independence advocates who did. Even though criticizing the KMT could result in a prison sentence, independence advocates still spoke up.
Following democratization, Taiwanese were no longer persecuted. If they had the right to criticize the president, then there was nothing special about criticizing the KMT. Independence advocates were no longer revered and any influence during elections evaporated.
These days, the public does not view someone willing to go to prison as a hero, but simply as a criminal, which is much lower than being considered a political prisoner.
During the former KMT regime, one could become a hero by castigating the authorities, but these days, people quickly tire of anyone scolding or yelling at others. Independence advocates sometimes even denounce each other, which looks even worse in the public’s eyes.
Times have changed, and those in the independence camp no longer understand how to behave to gain public support. They continue to live in the past, when denouncing and castigating opponents was the thing to do. It was unavoidable that their influence would wane and disappear.
Chen Mao-hsiung is a retired professor of National Sun Yat-sen University and chairman of the Society for the Promotion of Taiwanese Security.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under