The results of the 10 referendums held alongside the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections have been described as a major defeat for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The defeat of the proposal to have the national team compete at the 2020 Tokyo Summer Olympics using the name “Taiwan” instead of “Chinese Taipei” was a heavy blow to many who have advocated using a referendum to achieve formal independence and a new “sovereign” state.
If not even a referendum on the name of the Olympic team could pass — the proposal that has the least political baggage — then the Formosa Alliance should think twice before putting all its eggs in one basket and proposing referendums on independence and UN participation.
The unprecedented “referendum turmoil” might not be a bad thing and could even give the DPP an opportunity to extricate itself from its current political dilemma. Holding a referendum to let people directly express their views is the best, and perhaps only, way to stop wasting social resources on highly controversial issues on which there is no social consensus.
Even the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has had a drastic change of heart: After viewing referendums as a horrendous scourge, it put forward three proposals — against air pollution, food imports from areas in Japan and the construction of new coal-fired power plants.
A referendum is a double-edged sword. Seven passed last month: The ones already mentioned and four others on using nuclear power to smoothen the transition to green energy, continuing to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman in the Civil Code, banning education on homosexuality in elementary and junior-high schools, and defining the rights of same-sex couples in a separate law.
The next issue is dealing with the discrepancy between the ideals behind and real-life implications of the referendums on Japanese food imports, nuclear power and air pollution.
For instance, according to the referendum outcomes, Paragraph 1, Article 95 of the Electricity Act (電業法) — the “nuclear-free homeland” clause — should be abolished.
However, the Cabinet has said that the policy remains in place, but without 2025 as a deadline.
This means that the government must slow down implementation of its policy to develop renewable energy — which has caused tensions between local farmers, fishermen and environmentalists — review it and start anew, which is probably a good thing for Taiwan, as well as the DPP.
The referendum on defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman in the Civil Code contradicts the Council of Grand Justices’ Constitutional Interpretation No. 748. Although the referendum passed, it cannot change the legal recognition of same-sex unions.
However, the passage of the referendum on defining the rights of same-sex couples in a separate law means that the DPP must follow mainstream public opinion and enact such a law, which should help it out of its predicament.
Perhaps the “referendum turmoil” will cure Taiwan’s collective manic depression and allow all players to calm down, rethink, reflect and initiate new dialogue to resolve conflict.
The DPP, which has been trapped in a seesaw struggle between progressive and conservative forces for the past two years, might also get a chance to resolve its political dilemma, and administer the nation in a more pragmatic and stable manner.
For Taiwan, this could be a blessing in disguise.
John Yu is a civil servant.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs