On Dec. 8, the Central News Agency (CNA) cited US magazine The National Interest when reporting that since China’s Huawei Technologies Co (華為) opened its first flagship store in Taiwan in April, the massive use of Huawei products might have created a national security loophole.
However, the National Communications Commission (NCC) said that there is no such national security concern, because the law has long banned the use of critical China-made communication equipment in Taiwan.
At a sensitive moment when Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟), the daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei (任正非), was released on bail, but ordered to stay in Canada, CNA’s report was especially worrisome.
Although there is nothing wrong with the report itself, it needs to be clarified that the key point of The National Interest’s article was the wide use in Taiwan of “personal devices” made by Huawei.
The NCC was referring to the Regulations for Administration of Mobile Broadband Businesses (行動寬頻業務管理規則) passed in 2013.
As Article 43, Paragraph 9 of the regulations states: “The competent authority shall consult with relevant government entities in consideration of national security when approving or revoking a system development plan.”
So, under the supervision of the NCC, Taiwanese telecoms cannot use equipment made in China for their core networks or base stations.
Whether the telecoms can use Huawei equipment for their own systems and whether Taiwanese can use Huawei cellphones are completely two different things.
Even if there is no national security concern for the telecoms under the NCC’s monitoring, this does not guarantee that national security loopholes caused by the wide use of Huawei products do not exist.
In particular, Taiwan does not ban civil servants from using Huawei products when handling government affairs or documents. So the concern expressed by the magazine might remain a challenge for national security agencies.
Although there is room for improvement in terms of national security awareness about modern hardware devices, fortunately, cyberwarfare and misinformation on the Internet has received much attention after the Nov 24. elections.
The Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Sunday reported that the Executive Yuan has proposed a series of draft amendments to the laws against online misinformation.
In addition to imposing heavier punishments for damaging public interest by spreading misinformation online, what deserves more attention is an amendment to the draft digital communications act.
The amendment would require social media platforms, such as Facebook and YouTube, to fact-check items reported as false by the government or the public, and to remove such items within 24 hours after they are confirmed to be false.
Mostly drawn from German legislation, the amendment attempts to legalize social media platforms’ responsibility to self-regulate, while at the same time improving the transparency of the platforms’ operations.
The issue of whether social media platforms can play their roles as “judges” well should be approached with caution.
However, Taiwan asking social media platforms to take greater responsibility in fact-checking is part of an unavoidable international trend, and the amendment could well serve as a start.
Chiang Ya-chi is an associate professor at National Taipei University of Technology’s Graduate Institute of Intellectual Property.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with