After a tumultuous year for LGBTQ rights in Taiwan, there is finally some sort of timetable for same-sex marriage to be written into law after the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday last week announced that it would have a bill ready for the Legislative Yuan’s review before March 1.
However, under the Council of Grand Justices’ Constitutional Interpretation No. 748 last year, same-sex couples are to be able to register for marriage automatically from May 24. Is that really enough time for lawmakers to come to an agreement on the contents of the special law and pass three readings? The legislature was already having a difficult time agreeing to a law prior to the interpretation, which was meant to provide clarity on the nation’s direction on the issue.
However, things have become more confusing after the interpretation, as the government never took action, despite making multiple promises, clearly intending to drag the process on until the deadline. Meanwhile, the government’s delay allowed the groups opposed to marriage equality to mount a wildly successful campaign leading up to last month’s referendums, in which voters rejected same-sex marriage being included in the Civil Code.
Despite the Judicial Yuan confirming that a special law is to be made that would not contradict the constitutional interpretation, the government has gotten itself stuck between the majority opinion and the Constitution due to its failure to act and meet its promises. And this is a government that needs all the public support it can get after losing big in the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections.
Of course, the Constitution trumps public opinion, but it is difficult to say what the contents of the special law will be like, and the public should be watching closely. If the legislature is unable to pass a law before May 24, same-sex couples can still get married under the Civil Code — but if the special law ends up being significantly different from the Civil Code, it will turn into a bureaucratic nightmare for everyone involved. In such a scenario, those who want to get married would try to do it as soon as possible, which would cause even further tumult.
There should be no more delays, and if the government has promised that the special law will not contradict the constitutional interpretation, it should keep that stance regardless of the referendum results and the words of the opposition, who will surely not back down in the next few months. If not, it would lose whatever credibility it has left.
If the government lets this turn into another battle that drags on once again, it would only give the groups opposing same-sex marriage more fodder to spread their disinformation, and they have the money and resources for a long-term siege — which would only hurt the LGBTQ community in the end while the results would remain the same. Why go through all the trouble and make yourself look even worse in the process?
Taiwanese should still feel proud that Taiwan is to be the first nation in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage — it is just that the whole ordeal has put a damper on the celebratory mood and society is obviously not as progressive as people might think.
In this case, same-sex marriage is already a given. However, more concerning is what will happen to education, which is the only way to change public sentiment. Gender equity education will be even more difficult after the referendums showed the public’s opinion, which might cause elected officials to be even more reluctant to speak out in support of the LGBTQ community, as that is apparently against the wishes of most of their constituents.
Public opinion does not change overnight — it often takes generations — but it is clear that whatever the government decides to do with its gender equity education will have a huge impact.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations