Sat, Dec 08, 2018 - Page 8 News List

Learning from other financial scandals

By Carol Lin 林志潔

There have been several financial scandals in Taiwan over the past two years or so. From the XPEC Entertainment Inc case to that of Mega International Commercial Bank, SinoPac Financial Holdings Co, Ching Fu Shipbuilding Co, First Commercial Bank, Far Eastern International Bank and Farglory Life Insurance Co, one financial scandal has erupted after the other.

With great effort from all sides, Taiwanese banks finally received a positive review from the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering in its evaluation of anti-money laundering practices last month. As for how the country can encourage the good and jettison the bad, perhaps it could learn something from other countries’ experience.

The financial industry has always been a pillar of the Australian economy. In response to the raising of international financial supervisory standards in recent years, the Australian Royal Commission boldly and decisively launched an overall examination of financial institutions.

Through the commission’s investigation, the Australian banking industry was found to have four major flaws. First, relatively high-risk financial advice was being provided to clients. Second, illegal loans were being granted based on inaccurate or incomplete applications. Third, interest rates were being influenced — all the leading Australian banks stand accused of manipulating base rates. Fourth, anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing mechanisms were being contravened.

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia even failed to report more than 53,000 suspicious transactions to the authorities.

In its report, the commission severely criticized the Australian financial sector for complacency and for turning a blind eye to high risks, which led to serious examples of misconduct.

When a financial scandal breaks out, an enterprise needs to deal with consumers’ compensation claims and investors’ loss of confidence.

Since the public sector in Taiwan does not face the pressure of immediate compensation claims or a loss in market value, government agencies often act injudiciously when handling serious misconduct or accidents. Top officials hardly ever take action, other than to bow, apologize, resign or look for a scapegoat.

This is exactly how the Taiwan Railways Administration handled the Puyuma Express derailment in October. As the organization of the agency remains unchanged, the same problem is sure to repeat itself.

When technology was less developed, this method might have been temporarily effective, because people forget. However, with the advent of the Internet, various incidents caused by organizational disorder are constantly mentioned in election campaigns.

Although the government does not need to face any investor or consumer directly, it does need to face voters. If it does not propose a plan for reform, and show its determination and capability to change, the government is destined to be replaced.

After facing heavy punishment and a strong demand for internal reorganization, the Australian financial industry has learned a lesson: Non-financial risk management is as important as financial risk management.

Soon after a scandal occurs, an organization should be required to propose a timetable for reform and be pressured to adhere to it strictly, so as to root out its bad habits and change its corporate culture. This applies not only to the government in the public sector and businesses in the private sector, but also to the “third sector,” including organizations such as national universities, hospitals and foundations.

This story has been viewed 1745 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top