How would you feel if a stranger from a far-away city suddenly showed up outside your home and, claiming to be your relative, asked to stay for a week? The uninvited “relative” comes bearing gifts, but once ensconced in your home, starts grilling your family on the minutiae of their daily lives, jotting down answers in a notebook. You watch helplessly as your serially inquisitive houseguest from hell inspects your home for religious iconography, while your every action is carefully observed and logged.
Last week, an investigation by the Associated Press — confirmed by Chinese state media — revealed that beginning last year, 1.1 million Han Chinese local government officials have been fanning out across China’s Xinjiang region to spy on ethnic Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in so-called “cultural exchanges.”
As evidence builds of an expanding network of facial recognition-equipped closed-circuit TV cameras, checkpoints and “re-education camps” estimated to hold up to 1 million Uighurs and Muslim minorities, less attention has been given to a new form of intrusive state surveillance that places Chinese Communist Party officials into the last remaining sanctuary of the region’s embattled residents: their homes.
Xinjiang has become a dystopian neo-Stalinist police state, where regular visits by Han Chinese informers are designed to bring to the attention of the authorities any individuals whose first allegiance appears to be to their religion or ethnic group, rather than the party and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
The ChinaFile Web site in October published a report by anthropologist and regular visitor to the region Darren Byler that highlighted some of the techniques employed by visiting “relatives.”
“One could offer a host a cigarette or a sip of beer; a hand could be extended in greeting to a little sibling of the opposite gender, staying alert for signs of flinching. Or one could go out to the market for some freshly ground meat and propose that the family make dumplings. And then wait and watch to see if the Uighurs would ask what kind of meat was in the bag,” the report said.
A single false move or an unguarded remark would likely result in the family being informed upon and carted away to a re-education camp for months or even years of “corrective education.”
Meanwhile, award-wining Chinese photographer Lu Guang (盧廣), who lives in New York City with his wife, Xu Xiaoli (徐小莉), last month vanished while traveling through Xinjiang.
Xu, who last heard from her husband on Nov. 3, told reporters that she believes he was arrested by state security agents.
Lu’s photography focuses on environmental and societal issues in China. It is yet more evidence — if it were needed — of the increasingly wild paranoia of China’s police state. Now, it seems that even photography that occasionally depicts Chinese society in an unflattering light is forbidden.
Last month, Taiwan’s democracy achieved another milestone by successfully holding free and fair local elections together with a record 10 referendums. Although the results have left many voters disappointed, that another round of elections have passed peacefully, with the results accepted by the losing side, should be a cause for celebration, not despair.
Despite its many defects and deficiencies, Taiwan’s democracy is a beacon of hope for the downtrodden citizens of China and other dictatorships around the world.
As British statesman Winston Churchill once famously said: “democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry