On Nov. 11, the Liberty Times [sister newspaper of the Taipei Times] published an article by Hsieh Chia-hsin (謝嘉心) headlined “Taiwan is not yet ready for transitional justice.”
In the article, Hsieh refers to a symposium held by the Yin Hai-kuang Foundation, named for National Taiwan University professor Yin Hai-kuang (殷海光), whose writings opposed the authoritarian rule of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Addressing the symposium, historian Pan Kuang-che (潘光哲) said that Yin was never sentenced in court, but was instead subjected to a torrent of attacks by commentators, prevented from teaching at the university and restricted in his movements.
Agents eventually watched him around the clock and even intruded into his home. Without any court order, the agents sought to extinguish Yin’s quest for freedom in Taiwan, Pan said.
No one has ever traced who gave the order to clamp down on Yin, and it would be even more difficult to identify the departments and individual perpetrators who carried out the order. The files on Yin’s case have never been made public and his case has never been rectified.
The problem is not that Taiwan is unprepared for transitional justice, but that the perpetrators of repression under the KMT’s White Terror era and long years of authoritarian rule foresaw that there would eventually be a shift in power, leading to cases being overturned.
Fearing that their roles would be investigated, the participants had all along planned to conceal their names, backgrounds and positions, and their roles in the criminal repression. They destroyed as much evidence as they could while they still had the power to do so.
A few years ago, my younger brother and fellow dissident, Shih Ming-te (施明德), visited the National Archives Administration with his daughter to inquire about the 1970 Taiyuan Prison Incident, only to find that the informers’ names had been covered up with correction fluid.
In Yin’s case, the absence of a court judgement renders uncovering the truth and identifying the perpetrators even more complicated.
In 1962, I was arrested and imprisoned in the Jingmei military detention center. The prosecutor who indicted me and my eldest brother, Shih Ming-cheng (施明正), was Chen Tse-hsien (陳則先), a short, thin and callous military judge in his 50s who was nicknamed “The Evil Killer.”
It is difficult to know how many political prisoners he indicted and how many of them were condemned to death during his dozen years as a prosecutor. It was said that after those he condemned were shot, he would not sign and stamp their execution warrants until he had trodden on their bodies to drain their blood.
The judge who sentenced my codefendant, Sung Ching-sung (宋景松), to death was Cheng Ting (成鼎). He also sentenced Shih Ming-te and Chen San-hsing (陳三興) to life imprisonment and about 10 others to 12 years in jail, in addition to ordering the confiscation of their property.
The judge who convicted Shih Ming-cheng and myself was Nieh Kai-kuo (聶開國). Although I had an alibi, Nieh cobbled together some vague “evidence” from among the testimonies of the two dozen defendants to sentence me to five years in jail.
In its job of investigating the KMT’s countless crimes, the Transitional Justice Commission could start by publishing the names of the perpetrators who indicted, judged and sentenced the KMT’s victims.
Shih Ming-hsiung is a political victim.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.