The heated campaigning for the Nov. 24 mayoral election in Kaohsiung reminded me of something that happened 50 years ago.
The 1968 Kaohsiung mayoral election was another battle between two strong candidates and was no less fiercely contested than the one we have just seen.
That year the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) put forward Chen Wu-chang (陳武璋) as its candidate to compete with the China Democratic Socialist Party’s Yang Chin-hu (楊金虎).
The guidance counselor in my elementary school was concerned about the election outlook, so she held a mock election in class and asked the students to say who they supported. Only two students in our class — myself and one other — said they supported Yang.
Over the next few days I was called in to the school office every day and asked why I supported Yang, and whether I would not rather support Chen instead and go home and tell my father.
I was too scared to say anything and I did not tell my father, either. Consequently, I was repeatedly reprimanded or quizzed, supposedly out of “concern.”
The day before the election, the counselor asked me the same questions again and then told me to tell my family that they need not go out and vote. After all that fuss, the result was that Yang won the election.
That was my first political enlightenment. Although these things happened 50 years ago, the memories are still fresh in my mind.
To think that even a third-grader at elementary school could be put under surveillance — the very thought of it still gives me the creeps — but I cannot blame my teacher, because it was not her fault alone. In those days, the whole system was wrong.
A decade later, in 1978, I was in my first year at university. Each department had a different T-shirt for its students, ours being blue with red, green and yellow hems.
A military training instructor told us to remove the tri-colored borders, because they were the same colors as those used by Shih Ming-te (施明德), one of the leading figures of the dangwai (黨外, outside the party) opposition’s Formosa faction.
I asked the instructor whether all the red, yellow and green traffic lights should be taken down for the same reason.
In my second year at university, some students who were keen on literature spontaneously set up an underground book-reading society to research Taiwanese nativist literature, with students meeting in a classroom discuss their impressions and views about whatever we were reading. A military training instructor came in while patrolling the campus and said that our meeting was an illegal gathering, because we had not applied for permission.
I suppose that my long hair and beard must have made me look older than I really was, because the instructor came over and asked very politely: “May I ask what class you teach, professor?”
These events took place 40 years ago, when Taiwan was under martial law and it was said that everyone had a little Taiwan Garrison Command in their heart. In those days, the shadow of politics loomed everywhere, even in schools and colleges.
From 1986 to 1988, I studied in the US state of Kansas.
On one occasion, in front of some Taiwanese and Chinese fellow students, I said that the relationship between Taiwan and China was comparable to that between the US and the UK.
Simply because of that remark, apparently, my monthly letters to my family and their letters to me started taking a month to reach their destination.
In one of my father’s letters, he jokingly asked whether my letter had been sent via outer space.
Later on I started using an English name with a different address. When I did that, each letter arrived within a week.
Before I went abroad to study, my father had warned me not to talk about politics and some friends had reminded me that so-called “professional students” — those who received subsidies for informing on their fellows — were deployed on campuses all over the US to keep an eye on other students from Taiwan. Evidently, this was not a false rumor.
The experiences described above were upsetting at the time and decades later they are still firmly imprinted on my heart. No doubt many people around my age had similar experiences.
However, these experiences made me cherish freedom and they gave me all the more respect for the sacrifices and contributions that many of our forebears made for democracy in Taiwan.
They also made me understand the importance of academic neutrality and freedom of thought in the classroom, and taught me to respect diverse values with love and tolerance, while rejecting political brainwashing.
Taiwan’s progress toward democracy, openness, diversity and respect is worth cherishing. Now that the excitement of the election campaigns is over, no matter who has won and who has lost, we all need to get back to our normal jobs and lives. This is what I learned from these events that happened years ago.
Dong Gow-ming is an associate professor in Shu-Te University’s Department of Information Management.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.