North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is eager to hold a second summit with US President Donald Trump. Since their first meeting in Singapore in June, Kim has consistently outmaneuvered his counterpart.
Trump might still fancy himself a world-class dealmaker, but the truth is that Kim — like Russian President Vladimir Putin — has got Trump’s number.
Kim’s bonhomie (real or feigned) and promises of denuclearization have muted Trump’s threats, brought the South Korean government closer to his side and eroded international sanctions against his regime.
Kim has accomplished all of this without diminishing his regime’s nuclear capacity and he appears to have continued ballistic-missile development at 16 hidden sites.
Having gone from nuclear-armed pariah to presidential negotiating partner, it is little wonder that Kim would want a second summit to consolidate his newfound international legitimacy and position in the global limelight.
PERSONAL SUCCESS
Kim has already outdone his forebears. His father and grandfather both tried and failed to create a high-level channel to the US government.
The relationship that Kim has forged with Trump is thus an historic and personal success.
After six reclusive years in power, the 35-year-old scion of North Korea’s dynastic regime has made a remarkable debut on the world stage, both managing an erratic, ego-driven US president and setting the terms of the negotiations.
By contrast, the Trump administration has little to show for its efforts. Since the Singapore summit, US officials have reportedly been pushing the Kim regime to lay out a path to denuclearization.
However, the North Koreans have refused to turn over even the most basic facts about their arsenal. This stonewalling suggests that Kim has read Trump well.
As Trump himself contends: “I am the only one that matters.”
Trump’s narcissism, hunger for the spotlight and desperation to match former US president Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize are all that Kim needs to know about the man.
UPPING THE ANTE
The only question is how far Trump will go to secure something that he can hawk as an unprecedented deal with North Korea.
By agreeing to another summit while slow-rolling preliminary talks, Kim is reconnoitering Trump’s bottom line.
Recall that, as its up-front price for serious denuclearization talks, the North initially pushed for diplomatic steps, such as a treaty to end to the Korean War.
In Singapore, Trump promised to do just that, surprising Washington’s allies and US officials alike.
Then, in talks last month with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Kim upped the ante by also calling for an end to the international sanctions against his regime. No doubt, Kim is hoping that Trump’s impulsiveness will lead him to fold.
This month, Kim’s foreign ministry issued a public threat that North Korea could restart its weapons program if the US does not soften its position on sanctions.
As Pompeo pursues further talks in Pyongyang this month, Kim will surely hold his ground. Since declaring in June that North Korea is “no longer a nuclear threat,” Trump has backpedaled on virtually all of his demands, dropped his draconian deadlines and failed even to hint that Kim’s foot-dragging is a cause for concern.
Pompeo last month made no headway toward defining even the basic vocabulary of a future agreement.
According to officials who are familiar with the talks, on at least two occasions, the North Koreans asked him if he wanted to step out and call his boss.
As matters stand, the Kim regime and the US have yet to agree on the definition of terms such as “denuclearization,” “verifiable” and “irreversible.”
To be sure, playing Trump and reneging on promised steps toward denuclearization has its risks.
In May, Trump temporarily canceled the Singapore meeting in response to North Korean statements, and he did the same with talks between Pompeo and the North Koreans in August.
There is no guarantee that he would not repeat that gambit.
And yet, even if he does, Kim’s own penchant for drama — from firing missiles over Japan to carrying out frequent purges at home — suggests that he knows how to command the stage and bring Trump to the table.
Moreover, his ego-stroking personal letters to Trump show that he has a good fix on the US president’s psyche. So far, he has proved to be highly effective at keeping the bromance alive and the forthcoming summit on track.
Regardless of when the second summit occurs, the North’s regime will continue to reap dividends at the US’ expense in the meantime.
OTHER FACTORS
Trump’s cancelation of two major US-South Korean joint military exercises already has commanders from both countries worried about their military readiness.
International support for economic sanctions — particularly on the part of China and Russia — was steadily eroding even before the Singapore summit.
With a fourth summit this year between Kim and South Korean President Moon Jae-in in the works, it is clear that Moon’s political future is tied to rapprochement.
During his trip to Europe last month, Moon lobbied hard for the easing of sanctions, reflecting his government’s desire to engage, not embargo, the North.
It is time for the self-described master of the “art of the deal” to admit that he does not have one.
Trump prefers hype to the hard work of hammering out arms-control agreements, so controlling his craving for the spotlight will not be easy.
Nonetheless, when it comes to Kim, a bit of 54-year-old wisdom from former US senator Barry Goldwater, another outsider-turned-Republican Party icon, still applies: “The only summit meeting that can succeed is the one that doesn’t take place.”
Kent Harrington, a former senior CIA analyst, served as a national intelligence officer for East Asia, chief of station in Asia and CIA director of public affairs. John Walcott has covered foreign policy and national security for Newsweek, the Wall Street Journal and other publications, and is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under