Today the nation goes to the polls as voters will be casting ballots not just for the nine-in-one local elections, but also in a record number of 10 referendums. However, the elections are unique for another reason: China’s nefarious influence looms large as it brazenly interferes behind the scenes in Taiwan’s democratic affairs.
Beijing’s antics have not gone unnoticed by the international community, and its actions have compelled the US and Japanese governments to voice concern.
The primary focus of the international attention has been on the methods employed by China as it manipulates Taiwan’s elections.
Security analysts agree that ever since Taiwanese voted for their first directly elected president in 1996, Beijing has been interfering in Taiwan’s electoral process and continues to do so today. Over the years its methods have evolved into a full-fledged supply-chain, which is able to supply and support Beijing’s strategy of political subversion.
With a chain of command based in China, Beijing has constructed a multilayered network that enables it to channel financial payments, disseminate propaganda, and systematically mobilize agitators and provocateurs.
This sophisticated system has infiltrated deep into every corner of Taiwanese society, including media organizations, organized crime and underground gambling groups, as well as China-leaning pro-unification organizations.
China is using this covert network to distribute vast amounts of funding via Taiwanese businesses and other front organizations.
Behind the scenes, Beijing is manipulating Taiwanese media while its “Internet army” is promoting personality cults and working to distort the truth, sling mud, frame and bully anyone who is hostile to China’s aims.
The system is also churning out large volumes of fake news to brainwash the electorate, and shut down any dissenting views and opposing arguments. The purpose of all this activity is clear: to influence the result of Taiwan’s elections.
If Beijing is able to get away with using such underhanded methods, it will in a short space of time be able to mold its Taiwanese puppets — people over whom it has influence and control — into Messiah figures who are able to depict themselves as saviors of the nation.
Beijing will also be able to draw upon a reserve force of Taiwanese elites that it has been building up over the long term, and use these contemptible individuals to smear and frame pro-Taiwan voices.
If this is allowed to happen, it would not only be a nightmare scenario for Taiwan, but a catastrophe for all like-minded democratic nations.
Earlier this month Taiwanese news broadcaster Television Broadcasts Satellite (TVBS) pulled an exclusive interview with American Institute in Taiwan Chairman James Moriarty from its programming lineup one day after its initial airing. During the interview, Moriarty warned of “external forces” attempting to manipulate public opinion ahead of the elections.
The AIT subsequently posted the video of the interview on its Facebook page as well as a link to a news report saying that the removal of the interview by TVBS not only demonstrates the extent to which external forces are manipulating public opinion in Taiwan, but also raises concerns for the outcome of the elections.
The worry over today’s elections is not limited to the effect the results might have on the future development and political orientation of Taiwan’s county and municipal-level governments: far more concerning is the effect it might have on the future direction of travel for the entire nation.
Two US Navy aircraft carrier battle groups have been conducting exercises in the Philippine Sea this month.
Meanwhile, speaking at a seminar on Friday last week at US think tank the Hudson Institute, former Japan Maritime Self-defense Force vice admiral Yoji Koda said that the US and Japan would do whatever it takes to protect Taiwan.
Additionally, during last weekend’s APEC summit in Papua New Guinea, Taiwan’s representative, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co founder Morris Chang (張忠謀), and US Vice President Mike Pence held bilateral talks, while no meeting was held between Pence and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Both the US and Japanese governments have adopted a similarly strong stance toward Taiwan. As an interested party, caught in the middle of a power struggle between two superpowers, Taiwan cannot afford to turn a deaf ear to the US’ and Japan’s concerns over China nor attempt to place itself outside of events.
As Beijing steadily closes in on Taiwan and unleashes a variety of means to subvert and overturn its democratic system of government, the elections have taken on a new and significant meaning.
It is the new frontline in the nation’s battle to preserve its democratic freedoms in the face of Chinese dictatorship.
Each and every Taiwanese voter possesses the power, through their vote, to assert their position and send a clear message not just to Beijing, but to the whole world.
In addition to weeding out those politicians who have shown themselves unfit to hold office, voters must also take care not to overlook one referendum in particular.
Voters must vote “yes” in the referendum to rename the national sports team from “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan” when participating in the Tokyo Olympics in 2020. It is a golden opportunity for Taiwan to trumpet its democratic credentials and signal its strong determination to rectify the nation’s name to the whole world.
Trapped in the middle of a new cold war between the US and China, how should Taiwanese voters cast their ballots today? In favor of politicians and political parties who support the US-Japan alliance? Or should they throw in their lot with candidates who believe that Taiwan’s destiny is to become just another province of China?
If voters choose the wrong side, Taiwan will face certain calamity.
Protect your democracy, defend your country; let all Taiwanese unite under the banner of a sovereign and independent future for their country. The power is in your hands.
Chang Yeh-sen is chairman of the Taiwan Society.
Li Chuan-hsin is chairman of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Liao I-en is chairman of the Central Taiwan Society.
Weng Ming-chang is chairman of the Southern Taiwan Society.
Wang Min-chen is chairman of the Hualien Eastern Taiwan Society.
Ku Hsiu-hsien is chairman of the Taitung Eastern Taiwan Society.
Hsiao Hsiao-ling is director-general of the Taiwan Teachers Union.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
In the face of the COVID-19 crisis, cities around the world are re-evaluating the importance of accessible green spaces for the benefit of public health and well-being. However, Taiwan’s success in containing the virus might impede opportunities to transform its cities into greener, healthier and more resilient places. Urban vegetable gardens have been highlighted by community planners worldwide during this wave of the green-space movement. Such gardens help enhance food security and also mental health, which in turn fosters social resilience in local communities during lockdowns. Since 2015, Taipei has run the “garden city” program, which allocates vacant land for use as
In March 2011, then-US president Barack Obama’s director of national intelligence, James Clapper, told the US Senate Intelligence Committee that, considering both its capabilities and intent, communist China presented “the greatest mortal threat” to the US, followed by Russia. In the ensuing years, in the face of faltering US responses, China expanded and intensified its hostile actions against US interests and values. Consistent with US President Donald Trump’s call for a dramatic new approach, within months of taking office, his administration’s National Security Strategy said of China’s multidimensional assault: “China is using economic inducements and penalties, influence operations ... implied military