Amid international uproar over the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, some members of Saudi Arabia’s ruling family are agitating to prevent Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman from becoming king, three sources close to the royal court said.
Dozens of princes and cousins from powerful branches of the Al Saud family want to see a change in the line of succession, but would not act while King Salman — the crown prince’s 82-year-old father — is still alive, the sources said.
They recognize that the king is unlikely to turn against his favorite son.
Illustration: Mountain People
Rather, they are discussing the possibility with other family members that after the king’s death, Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz, the 76-year-old uncle of the crown prince, could take the throne, the sources said.
Prince Ahmed, King Salman’s only surviving full brother, would have the support of family members, the security apparatus and some Western powers, one of the Saudi Arabian sources said.
Prince Ahmed returned to Riyadh last month after two-and-a-half months abroad. During the trip, he appeared to criticize the Saudi Arabian leadership while responding to protesters outside a London residence chanting for the downfall of the Al Saud dynasty.
Prince Ahmed was one of only three people on the Allegiance Council, made up of the ruling family’s senior members, who opposed Prince Mohammed becoming crown prince last year, two Saudi Arabian sources said at the time.
Neither Prince Ahmed nor his representatives could be reached for comment.
Officials in Riyadh did not immediately respond to requests for comment on succession issues.
The House of Saud is made up of hundreds of princes. Unlike typical European monarchies, there is no automatic succession from father to eldest son. Instead the kingdom’s tribal traditions dictate that the king and senior family members from each branch select the heir they consider fittest to lead.
Senior US officials have indicated to Saudi Arabian advisers in recent weeks that they would support Prince Ahmed, who was deputy minister of the interior for nearly 40 years, as a potential successor, according to Saudi Arabian sources with direct knowledge of the consultations.
The Saudi Arabian sources said they were confident that Prince Ahmed would not change or reverse any of the social or economic reforms enacted by Prince Mohammed, would honor existing military procurement contracts and would restore the unity of the family.
One senior US official said the White House is in no hurry to distance itself from the crown prince, despite pressure from lawmakers and the CIA’s assessment that he ordered Khashoggi’s murder.
The official also said that the White House saw it as noteworthy that King Salman seemed to stand by his son in a speech in Riyadh and made no direct reference to Khashoggi’s killing, except to praise the Saudi Arabian public prosecutor.
The Saudi Arabian sources said US officials had cooled on the crown prince not only because of his suspected role in the murder of Khashoggi. They are also rankled because Prince Mohammed recently urged the Saudi Arabian Ministry of Defense to explore alternative weapons supplies from Russia, the sources said.
In a letter dated May 15, seen by Reuters, the crown prince requested that the ministry “focus on purchasing weapon systems and equipment in the most pressing fields” and get training on them, including the Russian S-400 surface-to-air missile system.
Neither the Russian Ministry of Defense nor officials in Riyadh immediately responded to Reuters requests for comment.
US ROLE KEY
The brutal killing of Khashoggi, a prominent critic of the crown prince, in the Saudi Arabian consulate in Istanbul on Oct. 2 has drawn global condemnation, including from many politicians and officials in the US.
The CIA believes the crown prince ordered the killing, according to US sources familiar with the assessment.
Saudi Arabia’s public prosecutor has said Prince Mohammed knew nothing of the killing.
The international uproar has piled pressure on a royal court already divided over 33-year-old Prince Mohammed’s rapid rise to power. Since his ascension, the prince has gained popular support with high-profile social and economic reforms, including ending a ban on women driving and opening cinemas in the conservative kingdom.
His reforms have been accompanied by a crackdown on dissent, a purge of top royals and businessmen on corruption charges, and a costly war in Yemen.
He has also marginalized senior members of the royal family and consolidated control over Saudi Arabia’s security and intelligence agencies.
He first ousted then-powerful crown prince and minister of the interior Mohammed bin Nayef, 59, in June last year. Then he removed Prince Miteb bin Abdullah, 65, son of the late King Abdullah, as head of the National Guard and detained him as part of an anti-corruption campaign.
About 30 other princes were also arrested, mistreated, humiliated and stripped of their wealth, even as the crown prince splashed out on palaces, a US$500 million yacht and set a new record in the international art market with the purchase of a painting by Italian Renaissance engineer and painter Leonardo da Vinci.
The entire House of Saud has emerged weakened as a result.
According to one well-placed Saudi Arabian source, many princes from senior circles in the family believe a change in the line of succession “would not provoke any resistance from the security or intelligence bodies he controls” because of their loyalty to the wider family.
“They [the security apparatus] will follow any consensus reached by the family,” the source said.
The US, a key ally in economic and security terms, is likely to be a determining factor in how matters unfold in Riyadh, the Saudi Arabian sources and diplomats said.
US President Donald Trump and his son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner have cultivated deep personal relationships with the crown prince.
One Saudi Arabian insider said the crown prince feels he still has their support and is willing to “roll some heads to appease the US.”
Trump on Tuesday vowed to remain a “steadfast partner” of Saudi Arabia, despite saying that Prince Mohammed might have known about the plan to murder Khashoggi.
Defying pressure from US lawmakers to impose tougher sanctions on Saudi Arabia, Trump also said he would not cancel military contracts with the kingdom.
Such a “foolish” move would only benefit Russia and China, he said.
King Salman is aware of the consequences of a major clash with the US and the possibility that Congress could try to freeze Saudi Arabian assets.
Those who have met the king recently say he appeared to be in denial about the role of the crown prince in what happened, believing there to be a conspiracy against the kingdom.
However, they added that he looked burdened and worried.
When the king dies or is no longer be able to rule, the 34-member Allegiance Council, a body representing each line of the ruling family to lend legitimacy to succession decisions, would not automatically declare Prince Mohammed the new king.
Even as crown prince, he would still need the council to ratify his ascension, one of the three Saudi Arabian sources said. While the council accepted King Salman’s wish to make Prince Mohammed the crown prince, it would not necessarily accept him becoming king when his father dies, especially given that he sought to marginalize council members.
Officials in Riyadh did not respond to a request for comment.
The Saudi Arabian sources say the crown prince has destroyed the institutional pillars of nearly a century of Al Saud rule: the family, the clerics, the tribes and the merchant families. They say this is seen inside the family as destabilizing.
Despite the controversy over Khashoggi’s killing, Prince Mohammed is continuing to pursue his agenda.
Some insiders believe he built his father a new, but remote Red Sea palace in Sharma, at the NEOM city development site — thrown up in a record one year at a cost of US$2 billion — as a gilded cage for his retirement.
The site is isolated, the closest city of Tabouk more than 100km away. Residence there would keep the king out of the loop on most affairs of state, one of the sources close to the royal family said.
Officials in Riyadh did not respond to a request for comment.
Swirling within the cybersphere’s vast ocean of reports, statistics and graphs about the international coronavirus pandemic, there is a short sentence out there in the worldwide web, which the Chinese government doesn’t want people to notice. It is on the Johns Hopkins University website “https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html” which houses the popular “live map” of Wuhan coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) data from individual countries. That sentence reads: “The map’s names of locations correspond with the official designations used by the US State Department, including for Taiwan.” Most readers may think this merely is an unremarkable footnote, akin to other source data on the site. But
On March 6, China announced through Hong Kong’s Chinese-language Ming Pao that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) would visit Wuhan “soon.” On the same day, US-based Chinese-language IPK Media published an article by Chinese tycoon Ren Zhiqiang (任志強), with the headline: “An official call to arms against Xi: The clown who insists on wearing the emperor’s new clothes.” Will the truth about the struggles inside the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak finally be revealed? Ren’s article is reminiscent of Tang Dynasty poet Luo Binwang’s (駱賓王) “An official call to arms against Empress Wu Zetian (武則天)
Recent global media coverage of Taiwan has at times reduced the nation’s success in containing the spread of COVID-19 to some East Asian values such as cooperation with social control or Confucianism. An article in Wired magazine debunks this myth, crediting the nation’s success to democracy and transparency. It is appalling to learn that this misconception still exists. Here is one thing that world citizens should keep in mind: Taiwan is the first and only country in Asia that has legalized same-sex marriage. There is nothing Confucian about that. If anything, the Confucian legacy is a major obstacle that Taiwanese
The novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 — or the Wuhan virus, after the Chinese city from which it emerged — could not have come at a more advantageous time for China’s communist government. Not for the Chinese people, of course, thousands of whom have perished because of Beijing’s lack of transparency, disinformation and cruel refusal to cooperate with international public health organizations. No, the advantage goes exclusively to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), whose deceptive practices unleashed the deadly virus to the world. To understand how Beijing benefits from the pandemic, it is necessary