Singers and court jesters
In her acceptance speech after winning the Golden Horse award for Best Documentary on Saturday last week, director Fu Yue (傅榆) said: “I really hope that one day our country can be treated as a truly independent entity. This is my greatest wish as a Taiwanese.”
Chinese actors and other film industry people attending the awards reacted by boycotting the farewell cocktail party and canceling all their celebration parties.
Chinese actress Gong Li (鞏俐) was chair of the jury at this year’s awards, but she declined to join film director and Golden Horse committee chairman Ang Lee (李安) on stage to present the Best Feature Film award.
The boycott by Gong and other Chinese film people was a sharp slap in the face for Lee and his statement that: “We hope that art can be art, and that no political issues will interfere with it.”
It also goes to show how Chinese film people are more like shadow puppets than real actors and artists. They are manipulated and controlled like the silhouette characters in a shadow play.
Han Dynasty Chinese historian Sima Qian (司馬遷) once wrote: “My office of annalist and astrologer was not far in rank from those of the diviners and liturgists, mere amusements for the emperor, retained like singing girls and jesters and counting for nothing in the eyes of the world.”
Chinese film people seem to have gone back to the status of singers and jesters in ancient times, only singing and acting for their rulers. The Chinese Communist Party’s opposition to Taiwanese independence means that these show business people are always on tenterhooks.
That is why they reacted to Fu’s pro-independence statement by criticizing her and posting the comment: “China, not even one bit less” on their microblogs, along with “stickers” with the same message and a map of China with Taiwan included in its territory.
How is this different from the role played by shadow puppets and marionettes that are completely controlled by puppeteers?
New Taipei City
Clowns and ‘oily fat sow’
Taiwan’s mayoral elections provide a bizarre range of food for thought. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung mayoral candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has been clowning around with his shining bald head and a campaign theme that Kaohsiung is old and impoverished.
Both the bodily politic and the fictitious nature of the campaign theme have been glaringly post-modernistic and have made Han an overnight sensation and rattled his opponent.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) put himself in power by his handsome demeanor and Han is determined to do the same by his baldness laced with salacious discourse.
Ma failed to donate his salaries when his campaign promises did not come to fruition; Han, however, is presenting himself as the savior of the proletariat and has made promises to bring his own lunch box and sleeping bag into the households of the working poor.
One cannot resist a guffaw or two at how anachronistic Han’s campaign gimmicks are, but one cannot help wondering how his absurd narrative still carries weight in today’s Taiwan.
This can be attributed to the pervasive sense of ennui — the result of the nation’s cursed inability to fulfill its quest of self-determination.
In this political climate, an entertaining fool who shuns conventional campaign strategies can do political wonders.
That is until KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) drops his bombshell by calling Presidential Office Secretary-General and former Kaohsiung mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) “an oily fat sow” while stumping for Han at a political rally.
Wu read history in his college days and certainly is judicious enough to know the enabling/disabling power of the words that come from his mouth. In this instance, the political charm and manhood that Han has taken an enormous pain to erect with his bald pate has been abruptly gelded.
One cannot foresee if Han would win this weekend, but certainly no one would question the potency of the expression “oily fat sow” should Han lose.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented