Technology is often oversold as either a panacea for the world’s problems or an unshakeable curse inflicting disruption and displacement on the most vulnerable, but historically, neither of these characterizations is accurate.
From the steam engine to the personal computer, inventions have transformed societies in complex ways. However, on balance technology has always created more jobs and economic opportunities than it has destroyed. That trend is likely to continue.
Why am I so upbeat? It is because everywhere I look, leaders are repositioning their economies to ensure that technological change and automation are assets rather than liabilities.
As the University of Oxford-based Pathways for Prosperity Commission recently observed, with “optimism and collective action,” so-called frontier technologies can empower even the poorest countries.
For much of modern history, export-driven industrialization and natural-resource wealth were viewed as the only mechanisms for sustained growth in the developing world.
However, new technologies, and the ability to combine them with old innovations, have today given people more say over their economic fortunes.
For example, the Africa Soil Information Service, which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has combined remote-sensing software and open-source data to lower the cost of soil mapping by 97 percent. This has given Africa’s smallholder farmers new tools for making evidence-based decisions about their operations, thereby increasing crop yields and reducing operating expenses.
Similarly, Twiga Foods in Kenya is using technology to optimize its supply chain by matching rural fruit and vegetable growers with small and medium-size vendors in Nairobi. Twiga’s approach has helped farmers access more lucrative markets, increased consumer choice and dramatically reduced post-harvest losses and waste.
Digital inclusion can be a powerful force, particularly for women. Go-Jek, a ride-sharing and food-delivery service in Indonesia, has increased drivers’ income by an average of 44 percent, while connecting many of its suppliers, who are usually women, to banking services for the first time.
To be sure, capitalizing on the transformative potential of technology would require investing more money in people, particularly in women and children.
As we argued in this year’s Gates Foundation Goalkeepers report, better healthcare and education — two pillars of the World Bank’s “human capital index” — can unlock productivity and innovation, reduce poverty and generate prosperity. These gains are essential to countries’ ability to achieve the targets set by the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Harnessing technology would also require sensible economic reforms, better infrastructure, more capable institutions and strategies to deliver digital solutions to marginalized populations.
Some countries are already taking these steps. For example, Indonesia has launched an ambitious program to connect an additional 100 million people to broadband, a recognition of the importance that connectivity plays in fostering economic opportunity.
Yet, for the bulk of the world’s “bottom billion,” basic phone and Internet services remain prohibitively expensive. That is why governments, donors and the private sector must work together to create business and pricing models that allow for cost recovery, while still providing an adequate level of digital service to the poorest consumers.
One poverty-reduction strategy worth exploring is communal access to technology.
Affordability is not the only factor that keeps technology out of the hands of the poor. The digital divide mirrors larger patterns of social discrimination, especially for women. Wherever women live, they are about 40 percent less likely than men to have ever used the Internet, which suggests that social inequities are also driving disparities in digital access.
Closing this gap is vitally important. When women have access to the full range of digital services — from mobile banking to telemedicine — they are generally wealthier, healthier and better educated.
As policymakers in developed and developing countries make decisions and investments that are to shape the landscape in which technological change unfolds, it is gratifying to see countries engaging in meaningful dialogue about their digital futures. As long as citizens who understand technology and its ramifications are included in these conversations, it is possible to design solutions that meet everyone’s needs.
Today’s cutting-edge technologies are evolving at a dizzying speed, but with foresight and preparation, the world can minimize the disruption they will inevitably cause to ensure lasting and inclusive growth.
If we coordinate our investments in people with our spending on innovation, the new “digital age” will leave no one behind.
Mark Suzman is chief strategy officer and president of global policy and advocacy at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry