The issue of “fake news” could become an issue on which the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) can make a real contribution to the international community, and in so doing raise their international reputations.
Asked by two US professors of law at a meeting in Europe early last month what the nation was doing to tackle fake news, Chiang Ya-chi (江雅綺), an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of Intellectual Property at National Taipei University of Technology, said that Taiwan seems to have no strategy in place.
Clearly, allies around the world are concerned about the “information warfare” that China and Russia have launched against democratic countries.
It seems that, since the 2016 US presidential election, no effective countermeasures have been developed. This is also the case in Taiwan. Information warfare is the ultimate weapon of rogue states, which use democracy to fight democracy, intending to destroy free and open electoral systems in Europe and the US.
This crisis could also be a turning point. Taiwan has come to be known as a “hackers’ paradise.”
According to an Asia-Pacific information security report released by Microsoft this year, information security attacks last year alone cost the nation as much as NT$810 billion (US$26.2 billion), or 5 percent of GDP.
Taiwan has often been at the top of the list of countries from where large-scale distributed denial-of-service attacks have originated, due to the amount of “zombie computers” here.
Taiwan lacks adequate education on information security and is right next to China, a totalitarian country with its “great firewall.”
Taiwan is a major producer of information hardware and a major victim in the new “information warfare” era. If the DPP is smart, and Tsai determined enough, they would redistribute resources, recruit talent, allocate funding, monitor the unfolding situation and conduct in-depth research into the disinformation that bombards the nation, so Taiwanese would at least know where the attacks were coming from and which areas were most vulnerable.
From there, the government could work out viable solutions, or launch an initiative with other countries on the issue.
Taiwan, Tsai and the DPP could become be a model for other democratic nations. An impenetrable “silicon shield” around the nation would help it become a core member of the world’s democratic allies.
The government should look beyond Saturday’s nine-in-one elections and the DPP’s performance, and move to initiate a program to appraise the situation, collate data and analyze Chinese information warfare that emerged in the run-up to voting. This would reinforce national security.
The likelihood is that this work would not be done should the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) return to power. Even if it did carry out such an initiative, would the results be trusted by Europe and the US?
Now is the time for the DPP to turn a crisis to its advantage.
Kang Yu-tsai is an adjunct professor.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry