First came the sweeping government pronouncements, then the flurry of actions — all aimed at shoring up China’s capital markets and rescuing struggling private companies.
But are they working?
Weeks into China’s latest campaign to support the world’s worst-performing major stock market and address record defaults, there have been some successes: Equities are far less volatile and more companies are selling debt at a lower cost.
Analysts are not convinced that the efforts will offer a sustainable fix for the financing problems that drove entrepreneurs toward a cliff edge in the first place.
“There’s no miracle drug to cure this disease,” said Dai Ming (戴明), a Shanghai-based fund manager with Hengsheng Asset Management Co. “Liquidity support will lift us out of a small-scale financial crisis and prevent bigger macro risks, but it won’t resolve the fundamental issue of financing difficulties for private and smaller firms.”
Here is a look at the support measures that China’s government, central bank and its lenders have taken in the past few weeks to ensure the supply of liquidity in the financial system.
China ordered its financial sector to address the risks associated with stock-backed loans, after the tumbling equity market triggered a rush of margin calls.
Banks were told to stop liquidating pledged shares, brokerages set aside funds to help ease the funding constraints for listed firms, while insurers and mutual funds were called on to buy securities. Companies are also doing their part after regulators made stock buybacks easier.
Local governments in Beijing, Shenzhen and Guangzhou have pledged their support.
The measures have helped arrest the downward spiral in Chinese shares, although sentiment remains muted. Brokerages, which provide most stock-backed loans, are preparing for losses by beefing up capital buffers.
While their shares jumped 23 percent since an almost six-year low in mid-October, they are still down 30 percent for this year. Stocks in the tech hub of Shenzhen — home to many privately controlled start-ups — are having their worst year-to-date performance since 2008.
China also asked large banks to increase their loans to private companies to at least one-third of new lending, or two-thirds for small and medium-sized banks. That is the first time that regulators have given specific targets on private lending.
It is a big request, and one that shareholders reacted badly to on Friday. The concern is that banks are being asked to do too much of the heavy lifting, potentially leaving them with even more souring loans on their balance sheets.
The central bank, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), helped revive a little-used hedging instrument that protects corporate bondholders against defaults, helping non-state companies sell debt. The PBOC said it would grant funding to financial institutions offering such tools, triggering a flurry of issuance for so-called “credit risk mitigation warrants.” Their popularity has brought down borrowing costs for firms such as chemical producer Zhejiang Hengyi Group Co.
To be sure, credit spreads for junk-rated borrowers remain wide.
There is still concern that China’s worse-than-expected economic slowdown will eat into corporate profits for the most vulnerable companies, analysts say.
At least one investor said that the high yields make China’s private debt attractive.
Signs of initial successes in the bond market have prompted the central bank to study ways in which similar tools can be brought to the stock market.
The bank is asking financial institutions to come up with ideas, saying that it is willing to provide funding to kick-start those programs.
There has been no detail so far on how such a measure would work, or how much money the central bank plans to set aside to fund it.
China’s biggest state bank by assets is expanding its bond-to-equity swap program, throwing a lifeline to private firms who might not have the cash to meet interest obligations or repay bonds at face value. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China reached initial agreements with 50 companies on the programs, six of which have started.
Direct state intervention has helped Beijing Orient Landscape & Environment Co access the bond market. The company, which said it would sell a 5 percent stake to a state-backed firm, successfully sold a note this month after struggling to issue a bond in May. Chinese regulators had already stepped in last month to stop liquidation of its pledged shares.
While the government’s quick-fix strategy has helped calm the panic, Nomura Holdings Inc analysts said that China would need to do more in the coming months to support sentiment, adding that liquidity conditions remain tight.
Making matters worse for China’s private sector is a record amount of debt that is due to mature next quarter.
Additional reporting by Dong Tongjian
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with