It did not come as a surprise that former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — known for his fixation on his legacy — entrusted a foundation named after him to hold a forum to remind the public that it was the third anniversary of his historic meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
What was surprising was the message he tried to send Beijing through the forum on Wednesday.
Given the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) dwindling influence in politics, which has been exacerbated by the government’s ongoing efforts to recover assets the party acquired during its one-party rule, the Xi administration appears to have given up hope of relying on the KMT to further its agenda of unification.
The flagship annual forum between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has not been held since the previous one in Beijing in November 2016, a departure from the CCP’s practice of cozying up to the KMT when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is in power to make life more difficult for the governing party.
Against this backdrop, Ma proposed a new “three noes” policy, calling it the best option to maintain cross-strait peace. They are: no exclusion of the possibility of unification, no independence and no use of force.
It appears to be a slight revision of the “three noes” policy that he proposed in 2007 when he was running for president, pledging to maintain a cross-strait policy of “no unification, no independence and no use of force.”
The difference between the two policies might just be a few words, but in light of the speculation that Ma might take advantage of his resurgent popularity to make a run at a third presidential term, it could signal a drastic change in the KMT’s cross-strait policy — from supporting the “status quo” to being open to the idea of unification.
By saying that Taiwan should not rule out unification, Ma is telling the CCP that such an option is on the table and that its best chance of realizing its ultimate goal of a “unified China” is by betting on the KMT again.
Ma’s stance not only shows the party’s inability to see that China is an enemy and Taiwanese must unite to fend off its aggression, but also underscores his hypocrisy, as well as the KMT’s.
In October 2015, the KMT forced then-deputy legislative speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) to give up her presidential candidacy on the grounds that her support for unification ran counter to mainstream public opinion.
Moreover, given that Beijing has never publicly backed Ma’s story that the so-called “1992 consensus” includes a tacit agreement that each side is free to interpret what “one China” means, Ma’s compromise on the unification issue reeks of desperation and could make it even more difficult for the DPP administration to protect the nation from Beijing’s “one China” shackles.
It is a warning that voters should heed if they are thinking of teaching the DPP a lesson by voting in support of the KMT in the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections. The consequences might be severe and long-lasting.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry