In New Taipei City on Sunday, reusable cups were supplied during a running event. This was part of an initiative launched by Taipei and Greenpeace in May to reduce waste from the use of disposable plastic cups at marathons.
Organizers said that, had reusable cups not been made available, as many as 10,000 disposable ones would have been used.
It is estimated that 4 million disposable cups were discarded at running events across Taiwan last year. Even that is a mere drop in the ocean compared with how many disposable plastic items are routinely used in the country, from plastic bags and disposable cutlery to cups and straws to packaging for food and goods.
The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) reported in September that 3 billion plastic straws are used in Taiwan every year.
Plastics are cheap to produce, light and multifunctional. However, if not recycled or properly disposed of, they present a serious environmental hazard.
Greenpeace said Sunday’s event showed that local governments care about sustainability and that the central government should follow suit.
The central government is making inroads into reducing the use of disposable plastics. The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) in February announced the phased rollout of a ban on disposable plastic straws, cups and utensils, culminating in a total ban by 2030. That still leaves more than a decade. People can do better.
A UN report on single-use plastics published this year said: “Ultimately, tackling one of the biggest environmental scourges of our time will require governments to regulate, businesses to innovate and individuals to act.”
People do not need to be told what to do by the government; surely they can use their common sense and stop using plastics unnecessarily.
Reduction of plastic bags, plastic cups and straws must be rolled out slowly, because of the inconvenience to businesses. If customers supplied their own reusable items then there would be no issue, and producers and researchers would respond by creating alternatives.
Following the initial phase of the ban on certain outlets supplying free plastic bags, the EPA found that about 70 percent of customers, when asked to pay a nominal fee of as little as NT$1 per bag, declined. This suggests that it was not important for them to use the free bag in the first place.
It is a reasonable assumption that most people use straws out of habit, not necessity. If they do need straws, there are alternatives to plastic, including glass, stainless steel, bamboo and food-grade silicone.
Asian University in Taichung has developed, in conjunction with biotechnology companies, a non-toxic, biodegradable plastic made from shells mixed with calcium carbonate and fruit enzymes, and a Taiwanese start-up named 100% Plants is producing biodegradable straws, plates, cups and cutlery from sugarcane byproducts.
Beverage companies, such as Pepsi and Coca-Cola, are also piloting bring-your-own-bottle schemes.
In addition to bans, charges at point of purchase and the provision of alternatives, public awareness campaigns by environmental groups and central and local governments are key to educating people about the need to change their plastic-use habits.
Cleanup campaigns and the disposable cup ban at marathons reinforce that message.
Together, these should promote a shift in people’s collective approach to plastic use. After all, if the change is to be long-lasting, people need to know why they are doing it, and it needs to be voluntary.
Let us not wait for the government. Let us be proactive and place the responsibility upon ourselves.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry