In the second half of June, aircraft from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) encircled Taiwan at least 13 times while surface ships carried out three combined sea and air drills in waters surrounding Taiwan.
However, since then China’s airborne encirclement exercises have come to an abrupt end, while hostile naval drills have also fizzled out.
What is the reason behind the cessation of the drills, and when can they be expected to start again?
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who is also Chinese Communist Party (CCP) general secretary and Chinese Central Military Commission chairman, has amassed an enormous amount of power over his nation’s government and its military.
Xi, who spent 17 years as governor of Fujian Province, is not only a member of the party’s “Taiwanese affairs faction,” he is also the most knowledgeable Chinese leader on all things Taiwan since the foundation of the People’s Republic of China.
Xi will therefore be fully cognizant of the potential for a backlash among Taiwanese voters should China engage in any saber-rattling prior to or during the nine-in-one elections.
There is also an external factor at play — the US military and its allies.
In June, warships from the US Pacific Fleet and the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force conducted military drills in the Philippine Sea between the first and second island chains. At the end of August, the two navies conducted passing exercises and the following month carried out additional joint military drills, followed by the Exercise Valiant Shield joint drills.
These exercises amassed a variety of naval assets in the region, including the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan, two Ticonderoga-class Aegis guided-missile cruisers and four Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers.
On Monday last week, the US and Japanese navies also started two-yearly drills called Exercise Keen Sword.
When a formation of US Navy ships — comprised of guided-missile cruisers and destroyers — sailed through the Taiwan Strait on Oct. 22, the Military Times Web site reported that the ships formed part of the USS Ronald Reagan’s carrier strike group. This meant that as those ships sailed though the Strait, the USS Ronald Reagan was providing a protective shield from a position of maritime superiority.
The scope of the US military’s drills did not stop there. On Oct. 23, a detachment from the US Marine Corps’ 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit and a squadron of F-35B tactical aircraft departed from Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in Japan, passed through the Strait and rendezvoused with US warships in the East China Sea, and conducted an in-flight refueling exercise with KC-130J tanker aircraft.
While Chinese officials were uncharacteristically restrained over the US Navy’s amassing of assets within the first island chain and passing through the Strait, the reaction to the news by Chinese netizens was at the other end of the scale.
They demanded that the PLA Navy dispatch warships or test-fire missiles, and many called on the government to teach the US a powerful lesson.
This jingoistic public sentiment, the side effect of years of brainwashing and “patriotic education” by the CCP, will undoubtedly be tapped into by the PLA when it decides to resume encirclement exercises.
US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson said during a visit to the Philippines that the US Navy would continue to sail through the Strait as part of its freedom of navigation operations.
However, it is worth noting that the internal and external factors that have forced the PLA to temporarily suspend its encirclement exercises will probably dissolve once the Nov. 24 elections are over.
The Republic of China Navy should draw a lesson from a near collision last month between a US Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer and the PLA Navy’s guided-missile destroyer Lanzhou while the US ship was operating within 12 nautical miles (22.2km) of Gaven Reef (Nansyun Reef, 南薰礁) and Johnson Reef (Chigua Reef, 赤瓜礁) in the South China Sea.
If the PLA resumes its encirclement exercises after the elections, whether with aircraft or surface ships, the nation’s military must ensure it is fully prepared for all eventualities.
Lu Li-shih is a former instructor at the Republic of China Naval Academy and a former captain of the ROCS Hsin Chiang.
Translated by Edward Jones
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under