One important aspect of democracy is the peaceful transition of power through democratic elections. After three transfers of government, Taiwan’s democracy stands up to scrutiny. It is something to be proud of and it is acknowledged by Western countries.
However, living in Taiwan, I worry at every election because of a major difference between Taiwan and Western countries: the huge divide on national identity.
Every party in the US recognizes the US as their country. Even in Ukraine, the main difference is between pro-Russian and pro-Western factions.
By contrast, Taiwan’s political parties are either Taiwan-centered or identify with authoritarian China, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) does. Although the KMT claims that they identify with the Republic of China, every party chairperson visits Beijing to pay tribute to the Chinese president.
Even though former president and former KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did not go there as chairman, he did meet with the Chinese president in a third country during his presidency, but failed to mention the name of his own country.
Since former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), who lifted the bans on independent newspapers and political parties, and his successor, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), Taiwanese democracy has advanced, bringing the Taiwan-centered Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to power.
However, after Ma took office in 2008, Taiwan backslid, with authorities settling political scores with Taiwan-centered political groups and inclining toward China. Had it not been for the Sunflower movement, Taiwan might already have been partly or even fully colonized by China.
This sense of crisis is difficult for Western nations to comprehend, just as it is difficult for them to understand how severely Taiwanese democracy has been eroded by the KMT’s ill-gotten party assets and the 18 percent preferential savings rate, because they have never had similar problems.
Now that the US has discovered the extent of China’s infiltration in the US, it will understand that China’s infiltration of Taiwan is even more severe.
As the Chinese fifth column is waving flags and shouting slogans in the streets, in effect setting up a Chinese beachhead in Taiwan, the government’s response is barely satisfactory.
Although the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections are local elections, they will affect the 2020 presidential election. The KMT is using various tricks to obscure facts and mislead the public. For example, it fakes poll results to erode confidence in the DPP and the government.
Meanwhile, China is finding ways to intervene, in particular by using the Internet to spread fake news, which is then disseminated by its agents in Taiwan.
Given these circumstances, Taiwanese voters should heighten their vigilance, analyze election-related statements and incidents, and take the time to reflect rather than simply act on impulse.
China’s ascendance, the opening of Taiwan to the enemy during the eight years of the Ma-led KMT administration and the KMT’s current fight for survival pose a much greater challenge to the current administration than was faced by any previous administration.
The DPP is also internally divided between radical and moderate factions. These factions must work together, lest the party identifying with authoritarian China regain power and lead Taiwan to its destruction.
Only if the domestic divide on national identity is bridged and all political parties become pro-Taiwanese can the DPP consider splitting into two parties competing for government power. That is the only way to consolidate Taiwan’s democracy.
Paul Lin is a senior political commentator.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this