The three visitors from the eastern bloc looked somewhat incongruous as they stood in front of Trump Tower in New York. It was September 1989. Leading the delegation was Frantisek Cuba, a bulky and bespectacled figure, the chairman of a showcase model farm in what was then Czechoslovakia. With him were his deputy, Miroslav Kovarik and the farm’s communist party boss, Pavel Cmolic.
The trio walked into the gleaming lobby and took the lift up to the executive floor. Their meeting was with then-real-estate businessman Donald Trump. For the men from behind the Iron Curtain, Trump was a celebrity capitalist. He was also the target of an extensive spying operation conducted by Czechoslovakia’s Statni bezpecnost (StB) intelligence service along with “friends” from the KGB.
The StB had been interested in Trump since 1977, when he married a Czechoslovakia-born woman, Ivana Zelnickova. News of the wedding reached the StB bureau in Zlin, the town in Moravia where Ivana grew up and where her parents lived. Ivana’s father, Milos Zelnickova, regularly gave the StB information on his daughter’s visits from the US and his son-in-law’s burgeoning career.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
The StB’s work on the couple intensified in the late 1980s, after Trump let it be known he was thinking of running for president.
The StB’s first foreign department sat up. Inside the Soviet bloc, Czechoslovakia’s spies were reputed to be skilled professionals, competent and versatile English-speakers who were a match for the CIA and MI6.
Cuba was on a 14-day business trip to Brazil, the US and Canada. Trump, who had recently launched his Trump Shuttle, appears to have told his guests to buy a Sikorski helicopter, possibly from him and used by his airline for short hops.
Cuba invited Trump to visit the farm, Slusovice. Trump reportedly agreed.
Reporters were shown a two-page write-up of the encounter, based on details supplied by agent Jarda. Jarda was one of four StB collaborators who spied on the Trumps during the Cold War. Jarda’s real name is Jaroslav Jansa. It is unclear whether Jansa was in New York, or learned of the visit once the official delegation flew home.
Now aged 74, and living in an apartment bloc on the outskirts of Prague, Jansa is reluctant to talk about his past. When the Guardian and Czech magazine Respekt knocked on his door, he refused to open it.
In an e-mail, he said he was tired and wanted to be left in peace.
He added: “You are trying to put me in the tomb.”
Jansa’s shadow career began in summer 1986, when he met an StB officer in the town of Vsetin, files reveal. After a meal in the box-like Vsacan hotel, Jansa agreed to become a secret collaborator.
Regular meetings followed. They were noted in an agent file. He got modest amounts of cash — on one occasion, 29 crowns (US$5-US$7).
Jansa was one of tens of thousands of informers in the SSR, the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. He spoke five languages, had a scientific background and was head of foreign cooperation at Slusovice. This meant he came into contact with prestige visitors, including congressional delegations from Washington and foreign TV crews.
The StB’s records are a window into a vanished age. As well as Trump, Jansa spied on a US diplomat based at the embassy in Vienna, James Freckmann. Jansa drove regularly to then-West Germany and Heidelberg.
His handlers told him to befriend Americans and to look out for US military convoys. If challenged, he was to deny that he was a spy.
Jansa set out to make Western contacts, and came back with business cards. One of them belonged to an American graduate researcher, Gary Geipel, who was writing a thesis on communist East Germany’s technology policy.
Geipel said he might have met Jansa in 1987 or 1988 during a visit to the Leipzig trade fair.
“It was a very different world. It’s hard to imagine the level of mutual distrust that existed,” Geipel said. “The assumption was that any American interested in IT was working for the CIA.”
After the fall of the Berlin Wall, Geipel discovered the Stasi had spied on him too and had visited his relatives in East Germany, bringing flowers.
He added: “Trump was married to someone of Czech origin. He was a prominent figure in an adversary society. It would be natural for them to have contact with him. I went to graduate school in Columbia. You could not be unaware of Donald Trump in 1980s New York.”
Jansa’s New York report was added to a bulging Trump file. It joined earlier secret documents, some of them recording little more than family gossip. In November 1979, Ivana went back to Czechoslovakia, bringing her two-year-old son, Donald Jr, with her. Her parents, Milos and Marie Zelnicek, picked her up at Prague airport.
The StB discovered that Ivana was no longer a model and was now “helping her husband in his business activities” — designing the interiors of Trump-financed buildings.
Donald Jr had two nannies — one American, one Swiss — and had recently fractured his leg.
“Her husband is connected to the election campaign of the current US president [Jimmy] Carter,” files said.
The StB’s source was Ivana’s father. The note, typed up by lieutenant Josef Knopp, said that the agency would give Ivana “operational attention” during her stay in Zlin. Intriguingly, it was copied to the 23rd section of the first directorate in Prague, which was responsible for running “illegals,” or deep-cover agents abroad. Its most famous asset, Karl Koecher, was embedded inside the CIA.
Eight years later, Milos was still briefing the StB, although by now Trump was a person of major interest. When Ivana visited in October 1988, Milos passed on her tip that George H.W. Bush would win that year’s US presidential election. He did, leading the StB to “deepen” its activity and to try and exploit Trump’s proximity to the “highest echelons of US power.”
It is unclear to what degree the KGB and StB shared or coordinated Trump material. The two spy agencies worked closely together, signing cooperation agreements in 1972 and October 1986. The KGB was always the dominant partner. It would have closely monitored Trump when he and Ivana visited the USSR in the summer of 1987, following a Kremlin invitation.
According to Kieran Williams, a professor of political science at Drake University, the StB’s chief concern was with dissidents and emigres living in the West.
It was keen to “shut up enemies,” including journalists working for Radio Free Europe.
It also wanted to stop the flow into Czechoslovakia of samizdat and tamizdat — literature banned by the state.
“Ivana was unusual in that she had achieved a status in US society. You therefore try and get information on her, but she was never politically active and I don’t think there was a long-term goal here,” Williams said. “It was purely opportunistic. I don’t think there was any strategy to compromise Trump. If anyone was going to do this, it would be the Soviets.”
Williams said the StB’s first directorate — like its elite KGB counterpart — was highly trained and competitive. Its attention to Trump post-1988 was signifiant.
“There was more buzz about Trump’s political ambitions after the election,” he said, adding that the first directorate’s involvement was “a big step up.”
“They were looking at a long-term operation,” he said.
However, this was curtailed by the dramatic and sudden collapse of the communist bloc. This happened in November 1989, soon after the Slusovice representatives met Trump in New York. Their plan to forge relationships with “large capitalist firms” fell into history’s dustbin.
The StB kept the identities of its informants secret by burning many files.
Trump eventually made it to Slusovice.
According to Cuba, the collective farm sent its small, twin-engine plane to collect the Trump family from Prague airport and to take them to Zlin. The event, in November 1990, was a sad one: the funeral of Ivana’s father. One of the mourners was Jansa, who stood 100m away from the Trumps.
During the same trip, Cuba showed Trump his collective’s biotech and electronic operations, he says.
By this point the farm — given unprecedented entrepreneurial freedom in communist times — was bereft of purpose.
“He was a forceful personality,” Cuba said of Trump.
Cuba’s colleagues, Kovarik and Cmolic, are both dead, one murdered, the other killed in the 1990s in a car accident.
None of the StB intelligence officers who spied on the Trumps for more than a decade appear to have suffered much in the transition to democracy.
Vlastimil Dank — the local Gottwaldov StB chief — was known as a hardliner who jailed and persecuted dissidents. He now lives peacefully in retirement, in a pleasant house with a front garden and a satellite dish.
“It’s the past. I would like to forget,” he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry