Since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office two years ago, her government has worked hard to attract investment, with impressive results, such as factories being set up or expanded by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co in the Southern Taiwan Science Park, Largan Precision Co in Taichung and Winbond Electronics Corp in Kaohsiung.
The World Economic Forum’s 2018 Global Competitiveness Report lists Taiwan as an “innovation hub” and its economy has outperformed those of South Korea and China. Why, then, are ordinary people not perceiving and applauding these achievements?
Tsai’s predecessor, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), adopted a central policy of a “single Chinese market.” This policy strengthened China’s magnetic attraction of Taiwanese businesses and jobseekers, thus accelerating Taiwan’s marginalization and slowing its economy, which even dipped into negative growth.
Tsai’s government has shifted to a policy of investing in Taiwan, especially the “five plus two” innovative industries, namely intelligent machinery, an “Asian Silicon Valley,” green energy, biomedicine, the national defense and aerospace industries, agricultural reform and the circular economy.
However, the cross-strait exchanges that the Ma administration threw wide open present a major problem. The cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and related agreements are still in effect and the semi-official Straits Exchange Foundation still has the mission of “promoting cross-strait exchanges.”
This facilitates China’s magnetism toward Taiwan’s medium, small and microenterprises. While fueling the higher levels of the economy, the government’s contradictory approach is allowing the nation’s economic base to leak away.
Despite having closed official channels of communication with Taiwan since Tsai took office, Beijing has been cultivating unofficial contacts, adjusting its policy to focus on younger generations and the social grassroots. This locally focused policy is helping China get closer to Taiwan’s basic industries and ordinary people.
On Feb. 28, China announced 31 preferential measures designed to attract Taiwanese microenterprises and young people to set up business in China.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office said that between January and August, China approved 3,265 applications by Taiwanese investors — up 29.6 percent from the same period last year. Evidently, China’s magnetism is still strong.
There are 1.45 million small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan, accounting for 98 percent of the total number of companies. This does not even include microenterprises.
These enterprises are the foundation of Taiwan’s economy. If their personnel, capital, skills and technology are allowed to flow to China under a policy of promoting cross-strait exchanges, the leakage would outweigh the spillover effect that the economic base receives from investments by bigger corporations. The overall economy would not reap the benefits of such a recovery.
The case of National Taiwan University president-elect Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) proves that excessive “exchanges” have become a question of national security. As important as it is to boost the “higher” economy, it is equally important to prevent the resources of the economic base from leaking away.
Restricting cross-strait exchanges is the only way to invigorate the economy in a way that ordinary people could perceive.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.