Since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office two years ago, her government has worked hard to attract investment, with impressive results, such as factories being set up or expanded by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co in the Southern Taiwan Science Park, Largan Precision Co in Taichung and Winbond Electronics Corp in Kaohsiung.
The World Economic Forum’s 2018 Global Competitiveness Report lists Taiwan as an “innovation hub” and its economy has outperformed those of South Korea and China. Why, then, are ordinary people not perceiving and applauding these achievements?
Tsai’s predecessor, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), adopted a central policy of a “single Chinese market.” This policy strengthened China’s magnetic attraction of Taiwanese businesses and jobseekers, thus accelerating Taiwan’s marginalization and slowing its economy, which even dipped into negative growth.
Tsai’s government has shifted to a policy of investing in Taiwan, especially the “five plus two” innovative industries, namely intelligent machinery, an “Asian Silicon Valley,” green energy, biomedicine, the national defense and aerospace industries, agricultural reform and the circular economy.
However, the cross-strait exchanges that the Ma administration threw wide open present a major problem. The cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and related agreements are still in effect and the semi-official Straits Exchange Foundation still has the mission of “promoting cross-strait exchanges.”
This facilitates China’s magnetism toward Taiwan’s medium, small and microenterprises. While fueling the higher levels of the economy, the government’s contradictory approach is allowing the nation’s economic base to leak away.
Despite having closed official channels of communication with Taiwan since Tsai took office, Beijing has been cultivating unofficial contacts, adjusting its policy to focus on younger generations and the social grassroots. This locally focused policy is helping China get closer to Taiwan’s basic industries and ordinary people.
On Feb. 28, China announced 31 preferential measures designed to attract Taiwanese microenterprises and young people to set up business in China.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office said that between January and August, China approved 3,265 applications by Taiwanese investors — up 29.6 percent from the same period last year. Evidently, China’s magnetism is still strong.
There are 1.45 million small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan, accounting for 98 percent of the total number of companies. This does not even include microenterprises.
These enterprises are the foundation of Taiwan’s economy. If their personnel, capital, skills and technology are allowed to flow to China under a policy of promoting cross-strait exchanges, the leakage would outweigh the spillover effect that the economic base receives from investments by bigger corporations. The overall economy would not reap the benefits of such a recovery.
The case of National Taiwan University president-elect Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) proves that excessive “exchanges” have become a question of national security. As important as it is to boost the “higher” economy, it is equally important to prevent the resources of the economic base from leaking away.
Restricting cross-strait exchanges is the only way to invigorate the economy in a way that ordinary people could perceive.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and