The governing principle of US President Donald Trump’s administration is total irresponsibility, a claim of innocence from a position of power, something which happens to be an old fascist trick. As we see in the president’s reactions to US right-wing terrorism, he will always claim victimhood for himself and shift blame to the actual victims.
As we see in the motivations of the terrorists themselves, and in the long history of fascism, this maneuver can lead to murder.
The Nazis claimed a monopoly on victimhood. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (My Struggle) includes a lengthy pout about how Jews and other non-Germans made Hitler’s life as a young man in the Habsburg Monarchy difficult.
After stormtroopers attacked others in Germany in the early 1930s, they made a great fuss if one of their own was injured. The Horst Wessel Song, recalling a single Nazi who was killed, was on the lips of Germans who killed millions of people. World War II was for the Nazis’ self-defense against “global Jewry.”
The idea that the powerful must be coddled arose in a setting that recalls the US of today. The Habsburg Monarchy of Hitler’s youth was a multinational country with democratic institutions and a free press. Some Germans, members of the dominant nationality, felt threatened because others could vote and publish. Hitler was an extreme example of this kind of sentiment.
Today, some white Americans are similarly threatened by the presence of others in institutions they think of as their own. Among the targets of an accused pipe bomber were four women, five blacks and two Jews. Just as (some) Germans were the only serious national problem within the Habsburg Monarchy, so today are (some) white Americans the only serious threat to their own republic.
Hitler formulated his version of total irresponsibility after the disaster of World War I, which destroyed the Habsburg Monarchy and fragmented its German ally. He found an explanation for the disaster that spared the ego of the German nationalists who had supported it.
The world was a struggle among superior and inferior races, Hitler said.
If superior Germans were somehow defeated in a war, this only proved that an invisible power stood behind the visible facts: global Jewry.
According to Hitler, Jews inculcated ideas, such as that of individual rights, that drew people away from their natural bloodlust. The notion that Jews are responsible for civil rights or immigrant protection, one that seems to have motivated the mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is an example of this Hitlerian way of thinking.
As Jews are supposedly responsible for rights, they are blamed when people beyond the dominant group exercise rights. Because the spread of the norm of rights takes place in the mind, the only response, Hitler thought, was to remove Jews from the planet. The accused Pittsburgh murderer — who was quoted as saying “all Jews must die” — seems to have thought in just this way.
The attraction of the Nazi conspiracy-thinking is that we can feel like victims when we attack. Its vulnerability is that the world is full of facts. Hence Hitler’s hostility to journalism.
In the Germany of the early 1930s, the newspaper industry was suffering after a financial crisis. Hitler and other Nazis used the idea of the Luegenpresse (“lying press,” fake news”) to attack remaining journalists who were trying to report the facts.
In Germany and Austria today, the far right once more speaks of the Luegenpresse, in part because the US president has made the idea respectable. The extreme right in Germany and Austria knows perfectly well that “fake news” is American English for Luegenpresse.
In the US today, reporting was already in trouble for similar reasons before Trump, like Hitler, began to claim that the reporters who seek the facts are liars and enemies. Naturally, the president denies responsibility when people take him at his word and draw instead from the conspiracy-thinking that he himself spreads.
Trump blames the press for attempts to murder members of the press. He seizes the occasion, as always, to present himself as the true victim. The facts hurt his feelings. Trump and some of his supporters mount a strategy of deterrence by narcissism: If you note our debts to fascism, we will up the pitch of the whining.
Thus, Trump can base his rhetoric on the fascist idea of us and them, lead fascist chants at rallies, encourage his supporters to use violence, praise a politician who attacked a journalist, muse that former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton should be assassinated, denigrate the intelligence of African Americans, associate migrants with criminality, run an anti-Semitic advertisement, spread the Nazi trope of Jews as “globalists” and endorse the anti-Semitic idea that Jewish financier George Soros is responsible for political opposition — but he and his followers will puff chests and swell sinuses if anyone points this out.
If Trump is not a fascist, this is only in the precise sense that he is not even a fascist. He strikes a fascist pose, and then issues generic palliative remarks and denies responsibility for his words and actions. However, as total irresponsibility is a central part of the fascist tradition, it is perhaps best to give Trump his due credit as an innovator.
Timothy Snyder is a Levin professor of history at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry