The governing principle of US President Donald Trump’s administration is total irresponsibility, a claim of innocence from a position of power, something which happens to be an old fascist trick. As we see in the president’s reactions to US right-wing terrorism, he will always claim victimhood for himself and shift blame to the actual victims.
As we see in the motivations of the terrorists themselves, and in the long history of fascism, this maneuver can lead to murder.
The Nazis claimed a monopoly on victimhood. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (My Struggle) includes a lengthy pout about how Jews and other non-Germans made Hitler’s life as a young man in the Habsburg Monarchy difficult.
After stormtroopers attacked others in Germany in the early 1930s, they made a great fuss if one of their own was injured. The Horst Wessel Song, recalling a single Nazi who was killed, was on the lips of Germans who killed millions of people. World War II was for the Nazis’ self-defense against “global Jewry.”
The idea that the powerful must be coddled arose in a setting that recalls the US of today. The Habsburg Monarchy of Hitler’s youth was a multinational country with democratic institutions and a free press. Some Germans, members of the dominant nationality, felt threatened because others could vote and publish. Hitler was an extreme example of this kind of sentiment.
Today, some white Americans are similarly threatened by the presence of others in institutions they think of as their own. Among the targets of an accused pipe bomber were four women, five blacks and two Jews. Just as (some) Germans were the only serious national problem within the Habsburg Monarchy, so today are (some) white Americans the only serious threat to their own republic.
Hitler formulated his version of total irresponsibility after the disaster of World War I, which destroyed the Habsburg Monarchy and fragmented its German ally. He found an explanation for the disaster that spared the ego of the German nationalists who had supported it.
The world was a struggle among superior and inferior races, Hitler said.
If superior Germans were somehow defeated in a war, this only proved that an invisible power stood behind the visible facts: global Jewry.
According to Hitler, Jews inculcated ideas, such as that of individual rights, that drew people away from their natural bloodlust. The notion that Jews are responsible for civil rights or immigrant protection, one that seems to have motivated the mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is an example of this Hitlerian way of thinking.
As Jews are supposedly responsible for rights, they are blamed when people beyond the dominant group exercise rights. Because the spread of the norm of rights takes place in the mind, the only response, Hitler thought, was to remove Jews from the planet. The accused Pittsburgh murderer — who was quoted as saying “all Jews must die” — seems to have thought in just this way.
The attraction of the Nazi conspiracy-thinking is that we can feel like victims when we attack. Its vulnerability is that the world is full of facts. Hence Hitler’s hostility to journalism.
In the Germany of the early 1930s, the newspaper industry was suffering after a financial crisis. Hitler and other Nazis used the idea of the Luegenpresse (“lying press,” fake news”) to attack remaining journalists who were trying to report the facts.
In Germany and Austria today, the far right once more speaks of the Luegenpresse, in part because the US president has made the idea respectable. The extreme right in Germany and Austria knows perfectly well that “fake news” is American English for Luegenpresse.
In the US today, reporting was already in trouble for similar reasons before Trump, like Hitler, began to claim that the reporters who seek the facts are liars and enemies. Naturally, the president denies responsibility when people take him at his word and draw instead from the conspiracy-thinking that he himself spreads.
Trump blames the press for attempts to murder members of the press. He seizes the occasion, as always, to present himself as the true victim. The facts hurt his feelings. Trump and some of his supporters mount a strategy of deterrence by narcissism: If you note our debts to fascism, we will up the pitch of the whining.
Thus, Trump can base his rhetoric on the fascist idea of us and them, lead fascist chants at rallies, encourage his supporters to use violence, praise a politician who attacked a journalist, muse that former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton should be assassinated, denigrate the intelligence of African Americans, associate migrants with criminality, run an anti-Semitic advertisement, spread the Nazi trope of Jews as “globalists” and endorse the anti-Semitic idea that Jewish financier George Soros is responsible for political opposition — but he and his followers will puff chests and swell sinuses if anyone points this out.
If Trump is not a fascist, this is only in the precise sense that he is not even a fascist. He strikes a fascist pose, and then issues generic palliative remarks and denies responsibility for his words and actions. However, as total irresponsibility is a central part of the fascist tradition, it is perhaps best to give Trump his due credit as an innovator.
Timothy Snyder is a Levin professor of history at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a