If anyone held the belief that the fight for the 2020 US presidential nomination is not fully engaged, US Senator Elizabeth Warren just proved them wrong.
On Monday, the Massachusetts Democrat used a campaign-style video to disclose a DNA test proving a very distant Native American ancestry. On the surface, Warren was fighting back against accusations that she improperly claimed that ethnic background, but this was not principally a rebuttal of slurs that US President Donald Trump and other Republicans are sure to keep making. What is really going on is invisible-primary positioning, even though she made no mention of the 2020 race.
Warren’s video did three things: By setting up Trump as her main foil, Warren elevates herself to presidential stature. Of course, the president gave her the opening by using ethnic slurs against her. Others have leveled accusations, too, but by focusing on Trump, the senator and her campaign team set her up as someone special, rather than just one in the crowd of semi-anonymous lawmakers, governors and mayors all maneuvering for the nomination.
Confronting Trump allows Warren to try to appeal to Democrats who are looking for a fighter to take on the president in 2020. Indeed, Warren’s skill at portraying herself as a tough combatant, but mostly with good humor and without bitterness, is probably her strong suit in nomination politics. That was a quality many Democrats liked about former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton during the last cycle.
The video itself, despite its focus on ethnicity, is in the style of a convention biographic introduction film — the kind that is played just before the nominee’s acceptance speech at the convention. Senators, even those seeking re-election, which Warren is doing at the moment, do not do extended biographies that go back to their roots and feature interviews of their family members — especially when, as in the case of Warren, those roots are in another state. She was born in Oklahoma.
In any case, the audience is not voters at this early stage. The video is intended for party actors — the politicians, campaign and governing professionals, formal party officials and staff, donors and activists, and party-aligned interest groups and the partisan press, who pay close attention to politics and have the most say in nominations.
For now, Warren’s goal has to be to convince as many party actors as possible that she is the legitimate frontrunner, even though she is still mostly unknown to most voters and therefore is just one of the pack in way-too-early polls. The more she can achieve any kind of prominence, the less party actors will encourage marginal candidates to stay in.
Candidates during this phase are making the rounds of those active Democrats, hoping to win endorsements or at least signs of interest. If they mostly encounter people already committed to another aspirant, they might choose against moving on to a full-fledged declaration of candidacy. Each one who drops out is one more who cannot suddenly catch fire and move from obscure also-ran to serious contender.
It is just a bonus if she successfully taunts Trump into responding, which would only enhance her credibility with Democrats.
Although it certainly created a stir on Twitter, the DNA video is only the latest in a series of solid moves Warren has been making.
The Washington Post’s Matt Viser reported on the advanced state of Warren’s campaign.
She has staffers in all four of the early states — Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina — and she has forged ties with candidates in next month’s midterms across the US.
“I speak a lot to candidates who are running this year,” said David Axelrod, a top political adviser to former US president Barack Obama. “She’s the first call they get after a primary. It’s not just the winners she’s calling, she’s calling the losers, too... The scale is pretty impressive.”
“This is how you go about building relationships and acquiring chits for a future project. It’s very smart,” Axelrod said. “If you were advising someone who had the resources of someone who was going to run for president, this is what you would do.”
Warren is not alone; US senators Kamala Harris and Cory Booker are making similar, but reportedly not as systematic or extensive, efforts and several 2020 candidates have raised money or made appearances on behalf of contenders for this year’s midterms. However, Warren seems to have the most comprehensive effort so far.
She has also done a good job of rolling out policy ideas, a step that allows would-be candidates to make specific appeals to various party groups while demonstrating that they are sufficiently serious to deserve support.
Most of these efforts target party actors, but there is also a secondary audience: the 20 or 25 other plausible nominees. On top of what they are hearing when they talk to insiders, the idea is that some will see how much Warren and a few of the others have done so far and conclude that it is already too late to catch up.
That does not mean she will necessarily win, of course. Warren has weaknesses and several other contenders bring their own strengths to the race. Her video did get some pushback based on the notion that it was a distraction from the final weeks of the midterms campaign. There is obviously a long way to go, and plenty of surges and fades can be expected over the next 15 months in what will almost certainly remain an open competition at least until the Iowa caucuses.
However, while there is no strong leader yet, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that Warren is more likely to win the nomination than any other contender at this point.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under