After President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) delivered her Double Ten National Day address on Oct. 10, observers in the media and academia came up with all kinds of interpretations of her words. As for exactly what Tsai was trying to express, their answers were all somewhat inconclusive.
Faced with an international community undergoing drastic changes and the US midterm elections next month, Tsai bade farewell to the obscure and ambiguous lines used in previous speeches, and instead clearly and deliberately came off the fence.
Later in the day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) called Tsai the worst of Taiwan’s four directly elected presidents.
As for China, it never misses an opportunity to attack Tsai, and its Taiwan Affairs Office responded to her speech later that day.
Before stating how Tsai came off the fence, a point hidden in the conclusion of her speech that has been overlooked should be highlighted.
Tsai said: “This country belongs to all 23 million Taiwanese. Our country must be kept intact and passed on to future generations.”
Without a doubt, this is her attitude toward what the nation embodies — whether you would like to call it Taiwan or the Republic of China (ROC).
The stance clearly shows that Tsai has shaken off neutrality.
First, she took sides for the first time between communist China and the democratic US. Her motive for doing so might be simple: Faced with growing pressure from Beijing, while being unwilling to compromise and unable to unilaterally fight back, her only choice is to connect Taiwan with the international community.
Tsai chose to stand by the US and echo the ultimatum US Vice President Mike Pence issued in a speech on Oct. 4.
She not only cited Pence’s condemnation of China’s suppression of Taiwan’s diplomatic affairs and its democracy, but also echoed the accusation Pence made against Beijing of social infiltration and intervention in the elections of other countries.
“Taiwan itself is a beacon,” Tsai said, hoping to illuminate the path for friends who are pursuing democracy in Hong Kong and China.
This also means that if, during the past two years, a historic window of opportunity existed between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the Tsai administration felt it had no choice but to pass due to China’s extremely harsh cross-strait policy.
The Tsai administration is now officially playing the “democracy” card, which is most offensive to Beijing, trying to draw a clear line between China’s authoritarian system of rule and its own.
Second, Tsai also made a choice between reconciliation and competition with the KMT.
She said: “Our country’s course of development is changing... Change also helps to correct the wrongs of the past.”
There is no turning back from pension reform, a nuclear-free homeland and transitional justice, she said, touching on three of the most controversial issues.
She was clearly drawing the battle line between “reformist” and “reactionary” as a way to bring voters back into the Democratic Progressive Party’s fold.
Despite Wu’s criticism, Tsai has won Washington’s trust with her character and style of governance.
Based on considerations of national interest, the US is adopting an approach of oppression and confrontation against China, while offering greater support to Taiwan, as it is certain that Taipei will not make trouble.
From this perspective, she is undoubtedly a successful president who has even surpassed some of her predecessors.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and