After President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) delivered her Double Ten National Day address on Oct. 10, observers in the media and academia came up with all kinds of interpretations of her words. As for exactly what Tsai was trying to express, their answers were all somewhat inconclusive.
Faced with an international community undergoing drastic changes and the US midterm elections next month, Tsai bade farewell to the obscure and ambiguous lines used in previous speeches, and instead clearly and deliberately came off the fence.
Later in the day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) called Tsai the worst of Taiwan’s four directly elected presidents.
As for China, it never misses an opportunity to attack Tsai, and its Taiwan Affairs Office responded to her speech later that day.
Before stating how Tsai came off the fence, a point hidden in the conclusion of her speech that has been overlooked should be highlighted.
Tsai said: “This country belongs to all 23 million Taiwanese. Our country must be kept intact and passed on to future generations.”
Without a doubt, this is her attitude toward what the nation embodies — whether you would like to call it Taiwan or the Republic of China (ROC).
The stance clearly shows that Tsai has shaken off neutrality.
First, she took sides for the first time between communist China and the democratic US. Her motive for doing so might be simple: Faced with growing pressure from Beijing, while being unwilling to compromise and unable to unilaterally fight back, her only choice is to connect Taiwan with the international community.
Tsai chose to stand by the US and echo the ultimatum US Vice President Mike Pence issued in a speech on Oct. 4.
She not only cited Pence’s condemnation of China’s suppression of Taiwan’s diplomatic affairs and its democracy, but also echoed the accusation Pence made against Beijing of social infiltration and intervention in the elections of other countries.
“Taiwan itself is a beacon,” Tsai said, hoping to illuminate the path for friends who are pursuing democracy in Hong Kong and China.
This also means that if, during the past two years, a historic window of opportunity existed between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the Tsai administration felt it had no choice but to pass due to China’s extremely harsh cross-strait policy.
The Tsai administration is now officially playing the “democracy” card, which is most offensive to Beijing, trying to draw a clear line between China’s authoritarian system of rule and its own.
Second, Tsai also made a choice between reconciliation and competition with the KMT.
She said: “Our country’s course of development is changing... Change also helps to correct the wrongs of the past.”
There is no turning back from pension reform, a nuclear-free homeland and transitional justice, she said, touching on three of the most controversial issues.
She was clearly drawing the battle line between “reformist” and “reactionary” as a way to bring voters back into the Democratic Progressive Party’s fold.
Despite Wu’s criticism, Tsai has won Washington’s trust with her character and style of governance.
Based on considerations of national interest, the US is adopting an approach of oppression and confrontation against China, while offering greater support to Taiwan, as it is certain that Taipei will not make trouble.
From this perspective, she is undoubtedly a successful president who has even surpassed some of her predecessors.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.