Hong Kong’s rare rejection of a UK journalist’s visa was about far more than the fringe political ideology he was accused of promoting. The move has been viewed as the latest escalation in a methodical campaign to tame dissent in the former British colony.
The push, which took shape after the Occupy Central movement locked down swaths of the territory four years ago, has seen the Beijing-backed government expand the zone of national security threats to include pro-independence activists and journalists who give them a platform.
The ultimate goal, say China’s supporters and critics, is passage of long-dormant legislation giving Hong Kong expansive powers to limit speech, protest and the activities of foreign groups.
Calls to enact the legislation — known as Article 23, for the section of local law requiring its passage — have reached their loudest level since 2003, when half a million protesters persuaded the government to abandon its last attempt.
The day after the Foreign Correspondents’ Club (FCC) hosted a pro-independence activist’s speech in August, China’s Hong Kong Liaison Office Director Zhang Xiaoming (張曉明), blamed “Hong Kong’s inadequacies in protecting national security.”
After that, the government approved an unprecedented ban against activist Andy Chan’s (陳浩天) Hong Kong National Party.
The territory also took the unusual step of denying a work visa renewal to Financial Times journalist Victor Mallet, who presided over Chan’s talk as the FCC’s acting president.
On Tuesday, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) dismissed as “pure speculation” efforts to link the visa decision to Chan’s address.
The incidents have fanned concern that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — emboldened by economic might and political turmoil in the West — is less committed to Hong Kong’s colonial-era guarantees of free speech, independent courts and capitalist markets.
They come amid international criticism over Xi’s efforts to consolidate power on the mainland, including jailing rights lawyers, holding tens of thousands of ethnic Uighurs in “re-education camps” and expanding online censorship.
The US and UK governments, as well as organizations representing almost 1,400 multinational companies with regional headquarters in Hong Kong, have demanded an explanation for Mallet’s visa denial.
UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt on Tuesday said he was “very concerned” about the move, which he could “only conclude is politically motivated.”
“These incidents cannot be brushed off as individual, isolated events every time they happen,” the American Chamber of Commerce, the largest international business chamber in Hong Kong, said in a statement on Monday. “Any efforts to curtail press freedom in Hong Kong could damage Hong Kong’s competitiveness as a leading financial and trading center.”
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ local office hit back at such criticism, saying in a statement on Saturday that Beijing “firmly supports” the Hong Kong’s government’s handling of visa issues.
“No foreign country has any right to interfere,” it said.
The controversy has put more pressure on Lam to rein in political dissent that has endured under China’s handover agreement with the UK.
In her policy address on Wednesday she repeated her line that she wants “to create a favorable social environment” before advancing divisive legislation such as Article 23. Still, she pledged to continue using existing laws to quash threats to national security.
“I will listen to these views earnestly and explore ways to enable the Hong Kong society to respond positively to this constitutional requirement,” Lam said.
During a visit last year to mark 20 years of Chinese rule and swear Lam into office, Xi warned that challenges to Beijing’s authority would not be tolerated.
Lam’s predecessor and former boss, Leung Chun-ying (梁振英), has re-emerged in recent weeks to call for revocation of the FCC’s government lease over Chan’s speech, comparing it to promoting “racism, antisemitism or Nazism.”
“There is a growing degree of pressure from the radical left on Article 23 and we are starting to wonder if Carrie can really hold on to her position on this matter,” said Alvin Yeung (楊岳橋), leader of the opposition Civic Party.
“No one has a crystal ball, but subject to what we have seen, those freedoms are under challenge,” he said.
China has demonstrated a willingness to use existing powers to crack down on its opponents in Hong Kong, even without passing Article 23. In recent years, tycoons and booksellers who published works critical of the Chinese Communist Party have disappeared from Hong Kong’s streets only to show up in police custody in China — an apparent violation of restrictions on national law enforcement operating locally.
After pro-independence activists were involved in a 2016 riot that left scores of police officers injured, the government seized on the public backlash.
Officials such as China’s local legal director Wang Zhenmin (王振民) argued that publicly advocating pro-independence views would be a violation of Hong Kong’s Basic Law.
After the government used similar arguments to ban some radical candidates from seeking seats in the Legislative Council in 2016, Leung led a legal fight to oust those who were elected to the body.
The Chinese National People’s Congress, exercised a rarely used power to interpret the territory’s law, paving the way for courts to remove two would-be lawmakers who had insulted the country during their oaths of office.
Chan’s party? It was banned using a colonial-era law that requires all social groups and organizations to register with the police.
To many in Hong Kong, the government’s message was clear: Pass national security legislation or we will use the tools we have.
“When there were the first attempts to legislate Article 23, we didn’t see any groups coming out to openly advocate for Hong Kong independence,” said Holden Chow (周浩鼎), vice chairman of the largest pro-Beijing party, the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong.
“Now, we really see the existence of these sorts of organizations, so I would say we have an imminent threat and the need to protect our national security,” he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry