How are you celebrating the anniversary of the fall of film producer Harvey Weinstein? Cake? Crackers? A festive sob in the loos at work?
Christine Blasey Ford on Sept. 27 told the US Senate Judiciary Committee: “I am here because I believe it is my civic duty to tell you what happened to me.”
Alyssa Milano (the actor who launched the #MeToo campaign), glared at them from the cheap seats as Republican senators waited patiently for the chance, one by one, to apologize to Brett Kavanaugh, US President Donald Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court who denies any wrongdoing, for the pain he had suffered.
And haunting the room, too, were the ghosts of Rose McGowan and Asia Argento, and the millions of people that came out as victims of sexual assault. A wood-paneled room, coffin-like, to hold the bodies.
Didn’t it feel as though we had been building to this? Building to this, over the past year of stories, this bloody showdown between the sexes, accusers and the accused, the men whose privilege was being poked?
A hearing, to follow a year of listening. And (though I write before the final decision is made) didn’t it feel like we knew, even before it began, exactly how it would end?
It’s been a year since Weinstein’s accusers came forward, though he still denies the allegations, and two since the broadcast of Trump’s “pussy grab” comment. And while on one hand it feels like we have witnessed great liberation in having heard so many swallowed stories of abuse, on the other, we grip a feeling of terrible weariness, the sense that only half the world has been paying attention.
I should have been working, but I was watching the live feed, and then the office emptied around me and I was late to a birthday party because even from 6,437km away the hearing had me stuck, pinned down.
“I was sexually assaulted and nobody believed me,” a woman called Maria Gallagher told US Senator Jeff Flake as he stepped into a lift in the Senate office buildings.
“Do you stand with these women?” asked another survivor of sexual assault, Ana Maria Archila.
Flake stayed silent — his answer came later, when he called for an FBI investigation into Ford’s allegations. They had forced him to look into their eyes.
If a woman’s civic duty is to speak up, what is the civic duty of a man? Women have been performing their civic duties across the world over the past year, reporting their trauma, not just simply to bring down a bad man, but to kick at the struts of a society that allowed it to happen.
And it goes further than sexual abuse, it extends to the way women have spoken out about other experiences that would typically have been forgotten in the dark, from abortions to miscarriages, to shed light on the realities of life as a woman.
However, the obligation that survivors must revisit horrors from their pasts — and, in doing so, open other women’s carefully dressed wounds — is a requirement that feels increasingly empty.
Doing so is only worthwhile if it actually changes something. Otherwise, having witnessed so many of these spectacles, where survivors of abuse have been ridiculed and disbelieved, soon these voices will quiet, and women will retreat once again into corners where they whisper warnings about handsy bosses and Internet creeps.
The reason that Republicans are ushering Kavanaugh through, despite what can kindly be described as a C-grade job interview (one that would not even get you behind the till at Shoezone, sorry Brett — and imagine a woman behaving like that, with the tears, the shouting?) is because of his hardline views on abortion, which, when normalized, have an impact on all women.
It is not a coincidence that those in power are, at best, choosing to ignore the measured testimony of women in pain. And it illuminates the need for change.
Rather than just speaking up, women need seats at the table so they can speak across. There is a bigger job to do; there are bigger jobs to win. A year since Weinstein, and this much is clear — the effect of #MeToo was not that it changed the world, but that it brought women together in preparation to do so. It was the beginning, not the end, and it taught us that we need more women in power, urgently.
This is how we will collapse the house of beer mats, and this is when we’ll know that change has happened: When women no longer have to fillet their histories to prove systemic harassment and abuse, stories of the boys at school, men on the train — when women are no longer accountable for men’s behavior, no longer have to broadcast stories of our abortions to protect the right to control our own bodies.
The rage that so many of us felt watching the Kavanaugh hearing should propel us to vote, to stand. We need more women in power so victims feel safe to come forward and so that when they do so, they are heard.
More women must get in the lifts with the people in power, not just as activists, but as elected peers, traveling up to the spaces where change happens.
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry