The vote for who should run Warsaw barely resonates outside Poland ordinarily, but this time, the scene is set for another election that could have repercussions for an increasingly divided Europe.
The city of almost 2 million is one of the last bastions of resistance to the nationalist, them-against-us political force that has turned Poland into the EU’s biggest rogue state. The municipal ballot on Oct. 21 pits the populists tightening their grip on all facets of Polish society against an opposition fighting to keep a foothold or potentially face oblivion.
“This is a historic moment that may decide our future for generations,” said Kamila Gasiuk-Pihowicz, a lawmaker for Poland’s Nowoczesna opposition party and among the most prominent leaders of anti-government protests. “We’ll either remain a part of the EU or we will drift to the East.”
Illustration: Yusha
The Law and Justice party has taken control of the publicly owned broadcasters, the biggest companies and the courts since winning the first parliamentary majority of Poland’s post-communist era three years ago. It also embarked on a defense of Poland’s national Catholic identity, which included a controversial defamation law on the country’s role in the Holocaust and the branding of some opponents as traitors.
Supported by that narrative in Warsaw, Law and Justice candidate Patryk Jaki, 33, has all but closed the gap in the polls on his leading opponent, Rafal Trzaskowski. The numbers suggest Trzaskowski, 46, would prevail in a run-off. Should he lose and the ruling party regains power in other regional councils too, opposition groups say the consequences would resonate for years, especially after Law and Justice changed rules for local elections to give the government more oversight of the process.
Already, Poland is in a protracted standoff with the EU over the government’s alleged encroachment on the democratic rule of law. Poland is the biggest net beneficiary from the EU’s common budget and there are signs the economy is increasingly reliant on that money.
Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki says that things are going great and any criticism is just trying to distract from the nation’s progress.
Morawiecki hailed the country as an “economic miracle” as the Polish stock exchange was promoted from an emerging market to a developed one by index compiler FTSE Russell.
This week, he dismissed a media report linking him to a scandal involving secret recordings of top Polish officials as a German-led provocation before the local elections.
Warsaw is the key battleground along with the Baltic port of Gdansk, where the Solidarity uprising that ultimately toppled communism started. It is now a stronghold of the opposition Civic Platform, which governed Poland from 2007 to 2015.
The son of Lech Walesa, the Solidarity grandee and Poland’s first elected president after communism, is running for mayor in the city.
On Tuesday, Jaki was pledging to build new metro lines with help from government funds offering coffee to pedestrians in downtown Warsaw. Trzaskowski walked in the old town presenting a thick booklet containing his election program and arguing his contender is just showing slides.
“Warsaw is a liberal heartland and extremely difficult territory for Law & Justice, but the party’s candidate has run an extremely energetic campaign,” Aleks Szczerbiak, professor of politics and contemporary European studies at the University of Sussex in England, said in a blog post.
However, Trzaskowski remains favorite to win and a Law and Justice victory in Warsaw “would be a political sensation,” Szczerbiak said.
Jaki connects with fellow Poles with stories of humble beginnings growing up in a Soviet-style apartment block. They are mixed, of course, with the kind of anti-Muslim comments that are common in Poland nowadays.
In 2015, he said he would take Muslim immigrants only over his dead body, although has toned down his message and backed off from his open support for more extreme nationalists groups.
One of the pillars of Jaki’s campaign has been to leverage his role in a government-appointed commission looking into irregularities in the return of Warsaw properties confiscated during communism. It is an issue that dogged outgoing Mayor Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz, a former central bank governor in the post the past dozen years.
“We want to destroy the corrupt structures” in Warsaw, Jaki said after a meeting with voters at a downtown cafe one afternoon last month. “It will be very tough, but I believe we can win.”
At the gathering, Jaki heard pleas for such things as more traffic restrictions in Warsaw. Among them was Antoni Bojanowski, who voted for the opposition candidate in 2015 presidential elections, but now sees Jaki as someone who could help fix the problem he is having with the ownership of the pre-war apartment block where he lives.
“Law & Justice may win in Warsaw because Jaki doesn’t have a strong enough competitor on the other side,” Bojanowski said. “By lacking a convincing message, the opposition is in fact helping Law & Justice.”
That is the worry for opposition leaders, Gasiuk-Pihowicz said.
The post of Warsaw mayor is crucial because it is a chance to be seen in the national media and City Hall independently approves — or rejects — applications for public demonstrations whether for or against the government.
She cites Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Law and Justice leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski, whose deceased twin brother, Lech, was the last mayor of Warsaw from the party when he held the post from 2002 to 2005.
Orban’s Fidesz party took Budapest for the first time in 2010, the year he was re-elected to power before becoming the lightning rod for anti-immigrant, anti-Brussels movements across Europe. He has held the post since with rising support, allowing him to increase control of most media and courts, and to crack down on non-government organizations.
The European Parliament last month slammed Orban for his “illiberal democracy.”
Yet he will not face actual sanctions, as several east European governments, including Poland, said they would veto them.
“If we lose, we’ll end up like opposition in Hungary, which is almost non-existent now,” Gasiuk-Pihowicz said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with