Language learning research
The Taipei Times editorial on Friday gives the impression that my research says that children can acquire language “naturally,” but adults “make conscious efforts to study through a grammar-based curriculum” (“Decide what is achievable first,” Oct. 5, page 8).
My conclusion, after more than 40 years of research, is that adults are very good at natural language acquisition, just the opposite of what is suggested in the Times.
The evidence is overwhelming: The best way to acquire language is not by “study,” but by understanding messages.
Studies show that classes that provide interesting “comprehensible input” are far more effective and efficient than traditional classes. Such classes include stories and promote self-selected reading.
If these conclusions are correct, better English will not be achieved by starting earlier (Letters, Oct. 5, page 8) or by increasing the number of weekly classes (as suggested by the Times). It will be achieved by providing more interesting and comprehensible input: More listening to stories, more self-selected pleasure reading.
Stephen Krashen
Professor emeritus
University of Southern California
Official recognition
US Vice President Mike Pence’s praise of Taiwan’s democracy is most welcome.
However, I find it hard to understand why, if Taiwan’s democracy is worthy of so much praise, the US and others don’t simply recognize the reality that the government in Taipei is the government of Taiwan and accord it full diplomatic recognition as such.
The government in Beijing is the government of China and is recognized as such.
Perhaps it would be easier for nations to recognize Taiwan if all Taiwan claims to be the legitimate government of the mainland were abandoned.
Gavan Duffy
Queensland, Australia
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with