For about three years now, reports and rumors have been going around that China and the Holy See were working toward an agreement about how to appoint Catholic bishops in China. The long-awaited agreement was finally signed on Sept. 22, during the Mid-Autumn Festival holiday, marking a major breakthrough in relations between the Vatican and China.
First it was rumored that the agreement would be signed at the end of the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy in November 2016, then in June last year and, once again, in March.
The repeated rumors were all signs that the two sides were forging ahead with their negotiations.
Now, the determined efforts of Pope Francis and Beijing have allowed prejudices to be set aside so that the two sides can join hands to accomplish the China dream that previous popes had not managed to achieve.
The word “provisional” in the title of the agreement could suggest that it is a break between rounds of a struggle, or that the two sides are still feeling their way across the river. Nonetheless, it definitely means that both sides have given up their bottom lines to open up new prospects.
It does, after all, take two to tango.
Compared with Francis’ ceaseless enthusiasm and determination to open the door to China, the Chinese side has had to make a considerable effort to overcome its own internal problems.
Francis’ political thinking is more left-wing than his recent predecessors.
His statement that it is better to make an all-out effort than to be resigned to one’s fate made clear his determination to care for China’s long-suffering Catholics.
It is precisely because he is so concerned about the series of repressive actions that China has taken against Catholicism in recent years that Francis, in his wisdom, prefers to see the big picture.
He hopes to use the agreement to try to reduce the persecution suffered by Chinese Catholics and to promote mutual tolerance and eventual integration between the government-approved Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association and the Vatican-loyal universal church.
Faced with calls from internal opposition forces, Francis has chosen the path of greater love to soothe their anxieties and have them lay down their grudges.
This means encouraging people to forget the painful experiences of the past and encourage all Chinese Catholics to come together and be free of persecution.
Of course this is easier said than done, so it remains to be seen how the two communities will interact as time goes by.
It should also be understood that there is not necessarily a consensus within the Chinese establishment regarding the agreement.
There are various government departments concerned with religious affairs, including the United Front of so-called democratic parties, the Chinese State Administration for Religious Affairs and the Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association.
These are all vested interest groups that have in the past controlled and even confiscated church property.
Now that the agreement between the Holy See and China has been signed, the State Administration for Religious Affairs will inevitably lose some of its power, since it must now pay heed to the Holy See’s standpoints.
The shape of its original territory of interests will surely undergo big changes.
In other words, China’s willingness to make compromises to reach an agreement must have an effect on these established vested interests.
The signing of the agreement can only have been achieved through a certain degree of upheaval within China. Looking on the bright side, the concessions made by China might bring wider benefits and mark a first step toward religious freedom.
The Holy See has publicly stated that the provisional agreement does not touch on the issue of diplomatic relations, and Taiwan is of course willing to take the Catholic Church at its word. Whatever the strengths and weaknesses of the agreement might be, it does, at least to some extent, present the possibility of ushering in qualitative changes in religious freedom in China.
Francis is taking a gamble in making this agreement, in the hope of raising the status of Chinese Catholics through dialogue.
As for Taiwan, as well as seeking to safeguard its diplomatic relations with the Holy See, it will continue to be a model of freedom for ethnic Chinese Catholics — a fine example from which China could well learn a few lessons.
Chang Meng-jen is chair of Fu Jen Catholic University’s Italian language and culture department, and coordinator of its program in diplomacy and international affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry