Last week, Kevin Systrom and Mike Krieger, the co-founders of Instagram, announced that they were leaving Facebook, where they had worked since co-founder Mark Zuckerberg bought their company six years ago.
“We’re planning on taking some time off to explore our curiosity and creativity again,” Systrom wrote in a statement on the Instagram blog. “Building new things requires that we step back, understand what inspires us and match that with what the world needs; that’s what we plan to do.”
Quite so. It is always refreshing when young millionaires decide to spend more time with their money. Facebook paid US$715 million for their little outfit when it acquired it — Instagram had 13 employees at the time.
However, to those of us who have an unhealthy interest in what goes on at Facebook, the real question about Systrom’s and Krieger’s departure was: What took them so long?
Since they are smart lads, one imagines they must have realized that what they were trying to do within the Facebook empire was doomed to fail.
They evidently hoped to continue to run Instagram as a distinct entity while harnessing the engineering and global computing infrastructure of Facebook to enable it to grow more quickly than it would have done as an independent company.
In that, at least, they were right. Instagram has grown like crazy. In June, it reached the 1 billion user mark. This year, it is expected to bring in US$6 billion in advertising revenue, which means that it is the biggest revenue generator within Facebook after the main news feed.
One analyst has estimated that Instagram would provide Facebook with US$20 billion by 2020, or about a quarter of the company’s total revenue.
If Systrom and Krieger imagined that they would be left alone to run such a money pump within the Zuckerberg dictatorship, they were delusional, especially given that for some time there were intimations of things to come.
Earlier this year, for example, Facebook removed a shortcut link to Instagram from its bookmarks menu inside the Facebook app, thereby eliminating traffic that flowed from Facebook to Instagram.
Whereas Systrom and Krieger originally reported directly to the “Supreme Leader,” a few months ago, Zuckerberg installed a layer of management between them and himself, with the result that the boys found themselves reporting to chief product officer Chris Cox.
At which point it must have been clear that the writing was on the wall. All of which is par for the Facebook course.
In 2014, the company paid a staggering US$19 billion for the messaging app WhatsApp, whose co-founder Jan Koum always vowed that its users’ privacy would be paramount.
“Respect for your privacy is coded into our DNA,” he wrote in a blog post after the Facebook acquisition had been announced.
“And we built WhatsApp around the goal of knowing as little about you as possible. You don’t have to give us your name and we don’t ask for your e-mail address. We don’t know your birthday. We don’t know your home address. We don’t know where you work. We don’t know your likes, what you search for on the Internet or collect your GPS location. None of that data has ever been collected and stored by WhatsApp and we really have no plans to change that,” he wrote.
Reading that at the time, one wondered what Koum had been smoking if he believed that he would be able to stick to those lofty principles within a corporation whose business model depends on knowing all those things about its users.
Within Facebook, Koum tried to run WhatsApp on his lofty principles. He even provided end-to-end encryption for users to make sure that their messages could not be monitored for targeting purposes.
However, Zuckerberg, who had left WhatsApp untouched and independent for some years, finally snapped.
The service would have to start making real money, either by weakening encryption or by some other means such as mapping users’ networks.
In April, Koum announced his resignation from Facebook and departed, a sadder, wiser (though much richer) man.
So the only surprising thing about the experiences of the fco-ounders of Instagram and WhatsApp is that anyone should be surprised by what has happened to them.
Facebook is a data vampire; the only thing it does is suck people’s life data to paint targets on their backs for the benefit of advertisers.
All that sanctimonious guff about “building a global community “ is just corporate cant.
Any start-up founder hoping to be acquired by Zuckerberg’s empire ought to remember former British prime minister Winston Churchill’s definition of appeasement as “feeding a crocodile in the hope that he will eat you last.” Because he will.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs