The leak of recorded remarks made by former Transitional Justice Commission deputy chairman Chang Tien-chin (張天欽) at an informal commission meeting has cast a shadow over transitional justice.
In their attempts to manipulate voters, the two main political camps have deviated from much-needed discussion over transitional justice, so, once again, the road to becoming a nation governed by the rule of law has been drowned out by a meaningless war of words.
The commission must recognize two things concerning its operations if it is to put the nation on a steady path toward being a nation governed by the rule of law:
First, transitional justice is a political project. Second, transitional justice must not be a political project that is undertaken without restraint.
Transitional justice requires reflection over the authoritarian regime. The fact that the political body of that time still exists means transitional justice has become a highly political undertaking.
Of course, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has done some things right, but it is the commission’s responsibility to address the crimes committed by the party-state, including its abusive use of power to arrest, illegally detain, torture and issue unjust judgements against dissidents.
Furthermore, as an independent government body, the commission must find out why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) continues to preserve the mistakes of the past.
The problem with these issues is that while many people in the old bureaucracy were voluntary accomplices, others were not willing — or sometimes even forced — accomplices.
Whether it is appropriate to allow perpetrators to remain in the bureaucracy or the political arena is an issue that must be considered in connection to the lustration process.
There are many ways to go about lustration. The most important question is how to determine the extent of an accomplice’s involvement and to what extent legal principles regarding accomplices or indirect perpetrators should be applied, as well as how to apportion responsibility.
The nation needs to set up standards for the commission’s investigation and decisionmaking by judges. Before these issues are properly settled, lustration will always seem to be a matter of political score-settling.
In an age when the word “politics” has almost become a swear word, the implementation of lustration becomes especially important.
Consequently, transitional justice must not be a political project undertaken without restraint. Restraining this power requires a comprehensive legal system and public awareness of the law.
Lustration is not included in the Act on Promoting Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義條例).
Article 4 of the act says that the commission should draw up plans to thoroughly investigate people linked to past abuses of power, but this is not lustration.
Article 6 mentions the investigation of liability, but it does not include relevant measures.
In terms of administrative regulations, neither the Regulations Governing the Transitional Justice Commission’s Investigative Procedures (促進轉型正義委員會調查程序辦法), the Regulations Governing the Investigation of Historical Truth About the Authoritarian Era (威權統治時期歷史真相調查辦法), the Regulations Governing the Transitional Justice Commission’s Processing of Public Complaints (促進轉型正義委員會處理人民陳情案件作業規定), nor the Act Governing the Transitional Justice Commission’s Handling of Transitional Justice (促進轉型正義委員會處理促進轉型正義條例) mention whether or how lustration should be applied.
If lustration is to be carried out and the liability of perpetrators investigated, a legal foundation is required. The commission must propose a lustration law to be reviewed and passed by the legislature before it can begin. Such a law must pass public scrutiny.
Only with legislative authorization would lustration have a legal foundation. Without that foundation, it would become a political tool.
The commission’s responsibility is to thoroughly discuss how such a proposal should be drafted. If it was only discussing the concept, what was it apologizing for? If it was only holding an internal meeting to discuss how lustration could be carried out, what was there to “expose” and why would people say: “I do not want that kind of transitional justice?”
Understanding of the rule of law and transitional justice is insufficient. Not only has the commission not clarified its role, society has also failed to clarify what role it should play.
This is also why, when the word “scandal” was bandied about, everyone thought something scandalous had occurred and felt satisfied to hear someone apologize.
However, in the end, it is still unclear what the commission should be doing. It has even been forgotten that the commission is responsible for drawing up regulations.
While lustration should not be undertaken without legislative authorization, it should be carried out — regardless of the timing — if a law clearly stipulates it. Otherwise, the never-ending election cycle would see it postponed until the nation perishes.
Once the commission is back on track, the public must form an accurate understanding of the rule of law and then monitor and comment on the commission’s operations.
Puma Shen is an executive committee member of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs