From massacre to exile to racism to subversion and back again, Russian President Vladimir Putin has caught Europe in a rolling trap. The war crimes that Russia encourages Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government to commit are forcing Syrians to run.
When a small proportion of them reach Europe — for never forget the rich world takes only a tiny minority of the world’s refugees — their presence drives Putin-supporting nationalists into power on anti-Muslim tickets.
The iron wheel is about to turn again and grind up the lives of hundreds of thousands. Diplomatic attempts to prevent a battle look as if they have failed, as they have failed so monotonously in Syria. In all likelihood, al-Assad’s forces and their Russian and Iranian backers will soon begin their assault on the Idlib Governorate.
Russian planes are already trying to take out defenses and there is every reason to expect a catastrophe. Doubtless, al-Assad’s forces will use chemical weapons again and Russia’s proxies on the “alt-left” will invent conspiracy theories to deny their existence.
Our filthy decade has taught criminals that they can break the taboo on the use of chemical weapons and not only be rewarded for it, but acquitted of guilt.
The Muslim militants in Idlib will presumably fight to the death and I cannot pretend to care for them one way or another. The democratic fighters and the civilians are another matter.
These are the people who out of fear of Assad’s torture chambers have nowhere left to run to except over the border and into Turkey, which has said that it cannot take any more refugees.
The UN has warned of a humanitarian crisis on a scale not previously seen in Syria — which is quite a claim.
To talk of Europe’s problems in these grim circumstances seems glib. Yet the most dynamic force in EU politics is the fear of uncontrolled borders and radical Islam.
It helped drive the Brexit vote and the election of backlash nationalists across the continent, whose peculiarities deserve more attention than they receive. They are nationalists of a rare type: supposed patriots who collaborate with their countries’ enemies.
UK Independence Party founder Nigel Farage’s Leave.EU campaign held multiple meetings at the Russian embassy in London. The Russian ambassador offered Arron Banks, Farage’s loudmouthed bagman, a piece of a Siberian goldmine business.
Now that Russia is committing small-scale chemical attacks on British soil, the flattery appears to have paid off. Nowhere on the radical British right do you hear challenges to Russian aggression.
If the contradiction between love of country and loyalty to Putin is wide here, it yawns in the Czech Republic. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the crushing of the Prague Spring.
Communist Party of Czechoslovakia First Secretary Alexander Dubcek thought that he could allow freedom of speech, democratization — all the forbidden fruits — while remaining a part of the Soviet empire. The Soviet Union put him right by sending in 250,000 troops and 6,000 tanks.
The civil resistance, and the men and women who died in the Russian attack were honored in Prague this summer, but Czech President Milos Zeman could not bring himself to appear at the memorial, because he is a Putin apologist.
The Czech Republic feels like a post-colonial country where the former overlord still holds sway. There ought to be a revolt against the country’s compromised leaders.
However, when I talked to intellectuals in Prague, they were close to despair. The Czech opposition is factionalized and unable to mount a coherent challenge to the ruling order. Civic society is degraded.
You may not think much of the British media, but there is nothing like travelling in eastern Europe to make you see their slender virtues. Press freedom is dying in the Czech Republic and there are few journalists able to hold the pro-Russian elite to account.
More frighteningly, the new right in the Czech Republic and across Europe is replacing with anti-Muslim bigotry a patriotism that defends the nation against hostile foreign powers.
That he is now the willing tool of an aggressive Russia in no way makes him a collaborator, Zeman implies: The real enemy is Islam.
We are always being told to understand the fears of what the new elite calls in its most condescending voice “ordinary people.”
However, if opponents of migration were serious about limiting it, they would support the creation of safe havens in Syria, so that refugees had somewhere to hide.
They do nothing of the sort. Instead, they support a Russia whose crimes against humanity produce the very refugees they affect to deplore.
As a way of generating votes, the hypocrisy might have a logic to it; a logic they can follow without fear of challenge from a modern left that has abandoned any claim to internationalism or basic moral fitness.
There is no need for Farage or indeed Johnson to worry about attacks from the degraded UK Labour Party, whose ethical collapse is becoming more evident daily to all with eyes to see.
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn was the willing and paid servant of Press TV, the state propaganda network of Iran, whose proxies now threaten Idlib. Nothing, not Iran’s record in Syria, nor its treatment of women, ethnic minorities and gays, could shake his dog-like devotion.
His spokesman Seumas Milne flew to Russia in 2014 to abase himself before Putin and tried to spread conspiracy theories about the Salisbury chemical attack.
Russia is now the most important outside power in the Middle East; feared and respected. The refugees that its policies spread bolster its far-right clients in Europe, while the dominant voices on a left that claims to oppose the far right excuse, rather than condemn Putin.
Syrians were the first, but they are not the only casualties of Russia’s Middle Eastern wars.
Nick Cohen is an Observer columnist
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry