After the National Museum of Brazil’s grand celebration of its 200th anniversary in July, its sudden destruction earlier this month in a massive blaze shocked the world.
Established by the Portuguese imperial family in its Brazilian colony, the museum boasted a collection of 20 million precious cultural relics, specimens and artworks, most of which were turned into ashes, a major loss for international cultural circles.
In a TV news report, a biologist stationed at the museum said in tears that history was lost that night.
Museums across the world should learn a lesson from this loss to prevent a repeat of the tragedy.
Over the centuries, many world-class museums, such as the Winter Palace in St Petersburg, the New York Museum of Modern Art, the former National Museum of Natural History in New Delhi and Paris’ Louvre Museum, have all been damaged by fires. No Taiwanese museum has experienced such a disaster, but there are many things that can be improved.
Take, for example, the National Palace Museum in Taipei, where I worked until retirement. The restaurants inside the museum pose a high risk. Who can promise that the gas used for cooking will not cause an accident, and who can promise that kitchen waste will not attract rats and bugs?
I repeatedly raised my concerns over the past decades, but the problem remains unresolved, which is quite worrying.
Museums housed in old buildings should pay attention to the replacement of electric wires to avoid fires, and they should conduct thorough tests on their sprinkler and fire alarm systems.
When the fire broke out at the Brazilian museum, there was no water in the two fire hydrants nearby. This was sadly reported to be due to cuts to the museum’s budget.
Brazil held the Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games in 2016. However, due to the government’s poor management, the Olympics cost several billion US dollars and, together with rampant corruption, added to an economic downturn.
Such are the problems that eventually led to the catastrophe. It is thus evident that striving for the right to host large international sports games could have irreversible consequences.
Today, there are many things waiting to be done here in Taiwan. Tasks including pension reforms, the long-term care plan 2.0, national defense and arms procurement all require huge budgets, so taxpayers’ hard-earned money must be spent wisely.
The cultural disaster in Brazil has taught us a shocking lesson: There is no need for Taiwan to repeatedly fight for the right to host large international sports events just to look impressive.
Since then-Kaohsiung mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) boosted her political reputation through the city’s successful hosting of the 2009 World Games, many politicians have striven to win the right to host international sports games.
Taichung Mayor Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) on Sept. 3 announced that the city would organize the first “Asia-Pacific youth games,” which would be held independently of the International Olympic Committee, and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁), a Kaohsiung mayoral candidate, has pledged to strive for the right to host the 2030 Asian Games if he is elected.
In light of the blaze at the Brazilian museum, the pro-localization DPP will hopefully adopt a different perspective. The government should not spend tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars to host such sports events.
Jhang Shih-hsien is a retired National Palace Museum researcher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry