Norway is seeking to buy credits to offset its fossil-fuel emissions more than a decade before it needs them to meet pollution goals for 2030, government officials overseeing the program said.
The move is an early indication of support from a major industrial country for an effort by the UN to revive a global carbon market that once generated US$33 billion in a year. Norway is one of the first countries to set out how it would use post-2020 carbon markets to meet its emission targets.
Norway supports a World Bank program to help develop rules for a new market, putting US$80 million into the institution’s US$200 million Transformative Carbon Asset Facility, the biggest contribution so far.
“We might not need the emission reductions” before 2030, said Atle Hamar, state secretary at the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment.
However, starting that year, the Scandinavian country aims to be “carbon neutral,” so it would need to use new markets to make up for its remaining domestic greenhouse gases.
Envoys from almost 200 nations yesterday wrapped up discussions in Bangkok on a set of rules for a sustainable development mechanism and other carbon markets under the Paris climate deal starting in 2020. The mechanism would channel funds for climate-related projects mainly to poorer nations in exchange for pollution credits that countries could use to reach their own goals on emissions.
Norway is Europe’s second-biggest natural gas supplier after Russia and is one of the first nations buying emission credits under proposed Paris rules.
The World Bank wants to raise US$500 million to leverage a much larger contribution from private companies and development banks for reducing greenhouse-gas pollution. The work might revive the existing UN Clean Development Mechanism, which generated more than US$300 billion for climate projects before the EU limited use of those credits in its Emissions Trading System.
Under the new market structure, all nations that volunteer to invest in climate projects overseas would be able to get allowances to offset pollution at home. It is not yet clear whether existing UN credits would be eligible for use under the Paris deal, but Brazil is among nations supporting that idea.
“The discussion on market mechanisms is speeding ahead — there’s a focus on getting markets to the implementation stage next year, risking leaving non-market mechanisms until later on a back burner,” Friends of Earth climate campaigner Rachel Kennerley said by telephone from Bangkok.
Under the Paris deal, Norway pledged to cut its emissions at least 40 percent from 1990 levels and it is working to meet that goal alongside EU nations. The EU has not said it would use Paris emission credits for its 2030 target, but it has said that it wants to be more ambitious in that period. Just how Norway’s goal meshes with the EU program remains a matter of negotiation.
“In case we fail to strike a deal with the EU, we might use flexible mechanisms, including emission reductions from TCAF, to meet our nationally determined contribution” under the Paris deal, Hamar said.
Five other nations — Canada, Germany, Sweden, the UK and Switzerland — are contributing to the World Bank program. New Zealand and South Korea have also indicated that they would buy credits to fill Paris pledges.
“International carbon markets support the efficient use of financial resources by reducing emissions where the lowest abatement costs can be found,” said Franz Perrez, an ambassador and climate negotiator for Switzerland.
Developing countries selling credits “will keep the cheapest emission reductions and the easiest ones to achieve and sell emission reductions that require more investments,” Perrez said. “Therefore, we expect higher prices for compliance credits than under the Kyoto Protocol,” the 1997 agreement that helped establish carbon markets.
International cooperation and carbon trading would spur faster emission cuts in the middle-income countries that are “central to the global transition” from fossil fuels, said Eva Svedling, state secretary to Swedish Minister for International Development Cooperation and Climate Isabella Lovin.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs