A shared consciousness and vision for the nation’s future are crucial to stave off Beijing’s efforts to subvert Taiwan’s narrative of its own identity.
Japan and the two Koreas are examples of nations with a mostly ethnically homogeneous populace fiercely proud of their cultures and histories.
China, with a rich culture spanning more than five millennia of largely uninterrupted development, and which has inspired and informed the cultures of many other nations in the region — Taiwan, Japan and the Koreas included — has much to be proud of.
A strong sense of nationalism, at its best, is a unifier; at its worst, it is a threat to peace.
Ethnic homogeneity and a long-standing shared culture can create national cohesion; so can shared experience and vision.
The US and the UK are nations of immigrants. The former is the younger nation, driven by the nature of its radical experiment with democracy, its embrace of diversity and the social mobility that lies at the core of the American Dream. The latter has the longer history, with its roots in the richness of cultural vibrancy that immigration has brought.
Taiwan is the product of a spectacularly storied past few centuries. It consists of a mixture of Aboriginal tribes, the descendants of immigrant farmers and merchants from southern China and a wave of immigrants who arrived after World War II with the exiled Nationalist forces of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
Taiwan’s populace has gone through several major changes of national identification — from Aboriginal inhabitants to Chinese immigrants to subjects of colonial Japan to citizens of the Republic of China (ROC).
The government is now encouraging the acceleration and consolidation of another wave of immigration — of peoples from other nations in the region, including China — embracing and assimilating the “new immigrants.”
Amid the influx of different waves of immigrants over the centuries has emerged a sense of a Taiwanese identity. The identity with Taiwan has been solidified by justified pride in the nation’s technological, economic, democratic and socially progressive achievements.
One way in which this is manifest is the push for the nation’s athletes to participate in international competitions under the name “Taiwan” instead of “Chinese Taipei.”
The name “Chinese Taipei” has been forced upon the nation by a foreign regime: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The title of the national team extends far beyond a mere name: It strikes at the heart of national identity, and even has national security implications.
If there is no shared identity, no shared vision of purpose, how do the armed forces maintain the level of morale and vigilance required to fight an aggressor?
Part of the CCP’s “united front” tactics is to chip away at this shared identity and national purpose. Beijing is not claiming that Taiwanese are not part of the same group, but it is challenging how that group is defined — by claiming it as a sub-group of the Chinese nation.
Thus, the CCP’s continued hammering in of the concept — among its own citizens, with the international community and in Taiwan itself — that there is only “one China,” and that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China; and by referring to Taiwanese as “compatriots” — a word that not only implies, but assumes that Taiwanese and Chinese belong to the same country — consolidates a narrative for Taiwan that is completely at odds with a separate Taiwanese identity.
It would be specious to suggest that the shared identification with Taiwan is as important to national security as the integrity of the armed forces, economic prosperity or international relations.
However, it is an important part of the mix.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry