Not so suspicious?
I was stopped by a sentence in a recent article attributed to an unnamed source of the Central Election Commission (CEC): “While checking the data for the first-threshold signatures, household registration offices also found that about 1 percent of the signatures in each of the three proposals belonged to people who are dead ... due to the large number of cases it is unlikely that those people passed away after signing the proposal” (“CEC finds irregularities in KMT proposals’ signatures,” Sept. 1, page 1).
What struck me was that it must take time to collect signatures from 1.45 million people (about 7.5 percent of the population over 17 years of age), and mortality in Taiwan reaches the 1 percent per year level at about age 65.
Using Ministry of the Interior data available on the Internet, the 2016 population of Taiwan (based on household registration data) and the abbreviated life table for the year 2014, and assuming that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members have the same age distribution as the general population, the average number who would have died in one year amounts to 0.6 percent of the population of over 18.
If we make allowance for aging of the population between 2016 and 2018 and for KMT members being on average three years older than the general population, that would rise to more than 1 percent. For every additional year of difference between the KMT and general populations, the number increases by about 13 percent.
Allowing a difference of five years would bring the expected annual death rate to about 1.5 percent.
If the canvassing paid more attention to old people than young people at the beginning of the campaign, that could easily have raised the expected annual deaths to 2 percent of the relevant population.
The reported number of deaths might be surprising if we knew that the campaign took substantially less than one year and that the age distribution of KMT members differs from that of population over 18 by less than five years.
If the span of dates attached to the signatures is less than three months, the observation is probably sound; otherwise maybe the CEC should rethink that part of the argument.
Emilio Venezian
Taichung
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under