After the torrential rain that fell in southern Taiwan last month, a wave of simplistic criticism has emerged, asking questions such as: “How have all those dozens of billions of New Taiwan dollars of flood-prevention funding been spent in Tainan and Kaohsiung?” and: “Why is flooding still happening?”
However, there is no discussion about technical details. It seems as if anyone who gives an explanation is offering bureaucratic excuses on behalf of the government.
Is that true?
The precipitation in Tainan and Kaohsiung, as well as Pingtung County, on Aug. 23 was indeed astonishing. Rainfall in much of the three areas far exceeded the “extremely torrential rain” level — accumulated rainfall of 500mm or more over a 24-hour period, according to the Central Weather Bureau — so that in just a single day, the totals topped more than the annual rainfall of many places across the globe.
ASTOUNDING RAINFALL
This is by no means ordinary “heavy rain,” which might be difficult to comprehend for people living in Taipei, who spend their typhoon holidays in department stores, KTVs and cinema complexes.
With regard to Tainan’s flood-prevention engineering, the city was allotted the largest share of all cities and counties, 20 percent — NT$16 billion (US$520.6 million) — of the central government’s NT$80 billion, eight-year flood-fighting budget, which has come under heavy criticism following the deluge, as people are wondering how there can still be so much flooding with all that money being spent.
In addition to such sentiment, the public should bear in mind that flood-prevention engineering always includes determining the project’s flood-prevention capacity, which, simply put, decides — based on the budget — how much rainfall the project should be able to handle when construction is complete and the project passes the final inspection.
The NT$16 billion in Tainan should have achieved a flood-prevention capacity of 250mm of rain, but the rainfall on Aug. 23 went far beyond that level, in many places reaching twice that volume on that one day alone. Expecting there to be no flooding under these conditions is fundamentally no different from asking for a miracle.
PREVENTION CAPACITY
Taking that into account, people might ask why flood prevention capacity standards were not raised at the time of construction, given that the capacity was not enough. Those who do might think that raising the capacity to 500mm of rain — or even 700mm — would be enough, but they might not be aware of the budget limitations and the difficulty involved in the engineering work.
Many people have the impression that flooding tends to occur less frequently in northern Taiwan, but there are several factors accounting for that difference.
First, the geography renders prolonged and extremely heavy rainfall less likely in northern Taiwan.
Second, the regional flood-control budgets differ: The budgets for the Tamsui (淡水河) and Keelung (基隆河) river basins were more than NT$30 billion and NT$50 billion respectively, far exceeding the amounts allotted to a whole city or county in southern Taiwan.
No one wants flooding to happen, but given this situation, one cannot help but wonder whether it is fair to criticize the budgets allocated to the southern parts of Taiwan as being a waste of money.
Jay Lee is an adjunct teacher of citizenship at National Nanke International Experimental High School.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under