After the torrential rain that fell in southern Taiwan last month, a wave of simplistic criticism has emerged, asking questions such as: “How have all those dozens of billions of New Taiwan dollars of flood-prevention funding been spent in Tainan and Kaohsiung?” and: “Why is flooding still happening?”
However, there is no discussion about technical details. It seems as if anyone who gives an explanation is offering bureaucratic excuses on behalf of the government.
Is that true?
The precipitation in Tainan and Kaohsiung, as well as Pingtung County, on Aug. 23 was indeed astonishing. Rainfall in much of the three areas far exceeded the “extremely torrential rain” level — accumulated rainfall of 500mm or more over a 24-hour period, according to the Central Weather Bureau — so that in just a single day, the totals topped more than the annual rainfall of many places across the globe.
This is by no means ordinary “heavy rain,” which might be difficult to comprehend for people living in Taipei, who spend their typhoon holidays in department stores, KTVs and cinema complexes.
With regard to Tainan’s flood-prevention engineering, the city was allotted the largest share of all cities and counties, 20 percent — NT$16 billion (US$520.6 million) — of the central government’s NT$80 billion, eight-year flood-fighting budget, which has come under heavy criticism following the deluge, as people are wondering how there can still be so much flooding with all that money being spent.
In addition to such sentiment, the public should bear in mind that flood-prevention engineering always includes determining the project’s flood-prevention capacity, which, simply put, decides — based on the budget — how much rainfall the project should be able to handle when construction is complete and the project passes the final inspection.
The NT$16 billion in Tainan should have achieved a flood-prevention capacity of 250mm of rain, but the rainfall on Aug. 23 went far beyond that level, in many places reaching twice that volume on that one day alone. Expecting there to be no flooding under these conditions is fundamentally no different from asking for a miracle.
Taking that into account, people might ask why flood prevention capacity standards were not raised at the time of construction, given that the capacity was not enough. Those who do might think that raising the capacity to 500mm of rain — or even 700mm — would be enough, but they might not be aware of the budget limitations and the difficulty involved in the engineering work.
Many people have the impression that flooding tends to occur less frequently in northern Taiwan, but there are several factors accounting for that difference.
First, the geography renders prolonged and extremely heavy rainfall less likely in northern Taiwan.
Second, the regional flood-control budgets differ: The budgets for the Tamsui (淡水河) and Keelung (基隆河) river basins were more than NT$30 billion and NT$50 billion respectively, far exceeding the amounts allotted to a whole city or county in southern Taiwan.
No one wants flooding to happen, but given this situation, one cannot help but wonder whether it is fair to criticize the budgets allocated to the southern parts of Taiwan as being a waste of money.
Jay Lee is an adjunct teacher of citizenship at National Nanke International Experimental High School.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more