The Port of Kaohsiung is the nation’s most important container port. It would only be reasonable that a Chinese state-owned company should not be allowed to operate a container terminal there, as it would be a major threat to national security.
The government still has not paid attention to the purchase earlier this month of Hong Kong-based Orient Overseas Container Line’s (OOCL) Taiwanese subsidiary by Cosco Shipping Holdings Co (Cosco), China’s largest container shipping company.
The damage may have already been done, but officials must quickly take steps to remedy the situation.
That OOCL was allowed to lease berths at Kaohsiung Port and set up the OOCL Kaohsiung Container Terminal is part of the rotten legacy of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) time in government.
At the time, the majority shareholders of OOCL’s parent company Orient Overseas Ltd, the Tung (董) family, had close connections to the KMT. Since the early 1970s, they have leased berths at the Port of Kaohsiung.
This issue should have been dealt with after Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) threw his lot in with the People’s Republic of China, or at least after he was selected as Hong Kong’s first chief executive in 1997.
However, the can was kicked down the road until Tung unexpectedly sold the company to the Chinese state-owned enterprise, cashing in on his many years of political investment. China’s decision to buy the company outright was probably a result of the company’s lease of berths at the Port of Kaohsiung and at the strategically important Port of Long Beach in New York.
Now that OOCL is taking over the Kaohsiung berth, the government must ramp up inspections of the company’s operations at the port to prevent its parent company, Cosco, from shipping goods that could endanger national security to Taiwan — and from Taiwan back to China.
These inspections must include personnel checks and the company must be prevented from using its facilities to gather information on military activities in the port.
In the longer term, Taiwan International Ports Corp should consider all options at its disposal, including terminating Cosco’s lease agreement at the Port of Kaohsiung, forcing OOCL to sell the OOCL Kaohsiung Container Terminal to Taiwanese investors, as domestic laws could be applied to restrict and control a Taiwanese investor.
However, Cosco would probably do all it can to obstruct the return of the container terminal to Taiwanese ownership. In such a scenario, the government must put in place plans to deal with the situation forcefully. Unfortunately, that would not be easy, as Cosco’s berths can now be used as a chess piece by Beijing to manipulate Taiwan-China relations.
Chinese ownership of the strategically important container terminal is a reflection of the Taiwanese government’s lackadaisical approach and lack of vigilance toward foreign investment.
The measures in place are insufficient. KMT-friendly Taiwanese corporations that used to receive favors from past administrations are now throwing in their lots with China, and the government’s failure to address this situation has now led to this result.
In the past, the KMT gave excessive perks and preferential treatment to a plethora of companies across different industries. Both from the perspective of transitional justice and national security, the situation can no longer be ignored and the government must conduct a thorough review of the situation.
Martin Oei is a political commentator based in Germany.
Translated by Edward Jones
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and