In a perfect world, countries treat each other with respect, equality and reciprocity, but this is not a perfect world. International politics is all about give and take and weighing the pros and cons, which is why the public should refrain from jumping to conclusions over each perceived slight.
On Monday, the Thailand Trade and Economic Office in Taipei announced that in light of the large demand for Thai visas, it had decided to outsource some of the work to a private visa agency, which is to charge a service fee of NT$470 on top of the NT$1,200 visa fee. It said that the measure would offer an alternative to visa applicants, who currently have to line up for hours at the office to submit their applications between 9am and 11am on weekdays.
However, the announcement has attracted an outpouring of criticism, some directed at the Thai office and some at President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy.
The policy is aimed at reducing the nation’s economic dependence on China, which deepened under former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) leadership. It is also designed to soften the blow from Beijing’s punitive policies against the Tsai administration, notably the reduction in the number of Chinese tourists to Taiwan.
According to statistics compiled by the Tourism Bureau, more than 4.1 million Chinese tourists visited Taiwan in 2015, but the number has been declining since Tsai took office in 2016. It dropped to 3.5 million in 2016 and further to 2.7 million last year.
While it would be hard to make up for the decline, the Tsai administration has attempted to offset the impact by looking to Southeast Asia for a solution.
It is against this backdrop that the government introduced visa-free entry to Thais and Bruneians on a trial basis in August 2016 and to Filipinos in November last year. Last month, the trial periods were extended for another year due to the program’s success in attracting more tourists from the three nations.
Tourism Bureau statistics showed that the number of Thai tourists to Taiwan climbed from 124,409 in 2015 to 195,640 in 2016 and further to 292,534 last year. The number of Filipino tourists to Taiwan also surged from 139,217 in 2015 to 290,784 last year.
Those numbers are why Thailand Trade and Economic Office Executive Director Thongchai Chasawath said on Tuesday, and in an interview late last month with the Taipei Times, that he did not understand the government’s and public’s insistence on asking for reciprocal visa-free treatment from Bangkok.
Chasawath said Taiwan has also benefited greatly from waiving visas for Thai nationals, and that that alone should be reason enough to maintain its current policy, rather than “threatening to revoke the treatment if Thailand does not reciprocate.”
Although Chasawath’s comments might sound harsh, they are not entirely unreasonable.
As Minister Without Portfolio Chang Ching-sen (張景森), who is in charge of the nation’s visa-waiver program, said on Tuesday, any decisions by the government on the provision of visa-waiver privileges to another nation is based mainly on whether the measure will benefit itself and its people.
“The reason why we offer visa-free treatment to Thai citizens is because we want to attract more tourists from the country to Taiwan. As long as they are still coming here, there is a reason to maintain the policy,” Chang said.
It is true that Thailand should try harder to provide better visa treatment to Taiwanese, considering its popularity as a tourist destination for Taiwanese.
However, it is unwise to resort to populism in a bid to force the government to cancel its visa-waiver privilege to Thais simply because Taiwanese do not enjoy the same treatment. Such a move will only hurt the economy and make Taiwan’s pivot from China all the more difficult.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.