Confusion over egg story
I am puzzled.
The last paragraph of an article about egg sales leaves me uncertain about my sanity: “While the maximum allowable residue of fipronil in poultry products has been eased from 5 to 10 parts per billion in November, many poultry farmers have become wary of using insecticides in their farms, resulting in more poultry diseases and reduced production of eggs, he said” (“COA urges rules on sales of eggs with cracked shells,” Aug. 15, page 2).
I assume the pronoun “he” refers to Kao Chuan-mo (高傳謨), chairman of the Taipei Egg Retailers’ Union.
My first interpretation of that statement was that, in the opinion of egg retailers, allowing more residue in the eggs makes farmers think that fipronil is less safe than previously thought, so the current levels of use are killing more birds than is warranted by the effectiveness of fipronil in preventing the spread of insect-borne diseases.
That is very unlikely; if the Council of Agriculture or the Ministry of Health and Welfare thought farmers behave that way, then it would have been more sensible to reduce the allowable level of fipronil in the final product to motivate farmers to use less insecticide.
My second interpretation was that the retailers’ union believes that farmers think the government is incompetent and therefore the relaxation of the level must mean that the government thinks that a high acceptable level would kill more people, and if it is dangerous for people, it must also be dangerous for the birds, making the reduction in use appear like a sensible decision for the farmers who want to protect their flocks.
That seems unlikely.
The only other explanation I can see is that the retailers’ union believes that the relaxation of the level of fipronil in the final product will fipronil consumers to believe that they are being endangered and therefore will halve the number of eggs consumed per week.
If the farmers have the same belief and if they are insured for losses due to disease in the flock, it makes sense for them to cut down on insecticide consumption and allow half of the birds to die, filing claims with their insurance companies for the loss of production and reducing their costs.
Are there other interpretations that make more sense?
Emilio Venezian
Taichung
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry