With another turn of the screw, China’s heavy-handed communist leaders are at it again, stubbornly fighting the tide of history. In the case of Hong Kong, they are trying to not only stop it, but to reverse it. Yet, despite the evidence of the past three decades, they fail to see that their crackdown on Hong Kong is guaranteeing either a showdown or a backdown on Taiwan.
Last week, Hong Kong police took action to shut down a pro-independence party. In a letter to the Hong Kong National Party, the territory’s Security Bureau said the unprecedented move was “necessary in the interests of national security or public safety, public order or the protection of human rights.”
Yes, the Beijing-controlled authority actually invoked “human rights” to justify further suppression of Hong Kongers’ political and human rights.
Black is white, white is black.
By increasing political control over the territory, China’s communist leaders are continuing the stultification of democratic development in China and permanently foreclosing any possibility of peaceful unification with Taiwan.
Under the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984 on the future of Hong Kong, the former British colony would become a semi-autonomous Special Administrative Region.
Then-Chinese president Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) proclaimed it the model for the “one country, two systems” solution he devised to lure Taiwan into the Chinese orbit.
He promised it would give Hong Kong — and eventually Taiwan — “a high degree of autonomy” from mainland China, except in the area of national defense and foreign affairs:
“We should have faith in the Chinese of Hong Kong, who are quite capable of administering their own affairs. The notion that Chinese cannot manage Hong Kong affairs satisfactorily is a leftover from the old colonial mentality,” he said.
Deng’s soothing words were intended to prepare Hong Kong and the world for the handover from Great Britain to China in 1997. The smiling, grandfatherly leader spoke them in 1984 — a year that in the literary world was already pregnant with meaning about the relationship between truth and power.
Five years later, he showed a different face to the students and workers gathered in Tiananmen Square. Many in Hong Kong watched with horror as the carnage unfolded on television screens and expressed their moral support with chants of “today Tiananmen, tomorrow Hong Kong.”
Taiwan’s citizens also noticed.
China’s communist leaders in turn observed the Hong Kongers’ sympathy for the Tiananmen students. It was during this fraught period that Beijing enacted the Basic Law — essentially Hong Kong’s mini-constitution. However, instead of providing for direct election of Hong Kong’s chief executive, it established its Election Committee, which would be dominated by people chosen by the communist regime. So much for Deng’s “faith” in the people of Hong Kong to govern themselves.
Hong Kongers still maintain a level of autonomy the rest of China does not have, such as freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. However, those rights are eroding, gradually and steadily, especially under the rule of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Pro-independence campaigners have been barred from running for office and others disqualified from the legislature. Other independence activists have been imprisoned for years, and booksellers have been jailed. Beijing has even extended its long reach by harassing family members abroad to silence dissenters in Hong Kong.
Deng’s plan to have Hong Kong serve as a model for Taiwan has not worked out as planned, even though the promise of a “high degree of autonomy” for Taiwan was repeated in China’s 2005 “Anti-Secession” Law — the same edict that threatened to use force if Taipei waited too long to accept Beijing’s rule.
In the spring of 2014, young people in Taiwan conducted major protests and even sit-ins in government offices, known as the Sunflower movement, to object to government policies making Taiwan economically dependent on China. Hong Kong students produced a video showing themselves singing “Don’t let Taiwan become the next Hong Kong,” to the tune of John Lennon’s Imagine.
A few months later it was the turn of Hong Kong’s young people and other dissenters, who took to the streets in what was called the “Umbrella movement” to protest Beijing’s tightening political control over the electoral system. China’s mishandling of the situation in Hong Kong has indeed shown Taiwanese what “one country, two systems” has to offer and they want none of it.
On the contrary, Hong Kongers seek the full democratic rights and freedoms that Taiwan enjoys, but China’s leaders refuse to see the handwriting on the wall, even when it was in the blood of Chinese in Tiananmen Square. They insist that to see the future of Taiwan, look to China. The democratic aspirations of Hong Kong, the democratic example of Taiwan and history itself offer a different reality: For the future of China, look to Taiwan.
Joseph Bosco served as China country director in the office of the US secretary of defense and taught a graduate seminar on Taiwan-US-China relations at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. He is a fellow at the Institute for Taiwan-American Studies. This article originally appeared in The Hill on Aug. 6.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.