The “Trump doctrine” is fairly straightforward: If a deal, regardless of its historical importance or role in securing the welfare of the people or defense of the state, is deemed bad, then it should be renegotiated or, if that seems hard, discarded. Also, deals involving those who have wronged US President Donald Trump should be reviewed first.
Trump has so far only applied his doctrine to the highest level of US obligations, such as NATO and the North American Free Trade Agreement, or the most obvious deals he perceives as unfair, like Chinese trade practices.
Unsurprisingly, the doctrine, having been applied so broadly and haphazardly, has failed to do much to support long-term US interests: Manufacturers and small farming operations are moving out or closing down, allies are questioning the US’ stability and the veracity of its intentions, and opportunities to secure US priorities are being missed.
One such opportunity is the chance to condemn Chinese efforts to verbally annex Taiwan. Through a combination of dollar diplomacy and overt political manipulation, China has succeeded in reducing the nation’s international standing and economic outlook.
Trump could stifle China’s efforts and, correspondingly, assist a growing democracy in a region of immense significance.
In response to Taiwanese electing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), a staunch advocate of the nation’s democracy, China pushed four countries to end their allyships with Taiwan. China lured these countries with promises of increased investment and closer political ties. Now just 19 members of the UN recognize Taiwan.
On the economic side, China threatened to limit entry into its lucrative market to any airline that lists Taiwan as a country. Airlines quickly relented. Case in point, British Airways relisted their flights to the nation as Taipei, Taiwan — China.
The latest example of Chinese “namefare” resulted in Taiwan losing the right to host next year’s East Asian Youth Games.
Trump ought to apply his doctrine to China denying Taiwan of this meaningful opportunity. Chinese action meets the only tests imposed by the doctrine: one, it is a bad deal; and two, China — at least in Trump’s opinion — has previously wronged him.
On the first test: What makes China’s pressure on the East Asian Olympic Committee (EAOC) — the body responsible for revoking Taiwan as the host of the Games — a bad deal?
According to the Olympic creed: “The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win, but to take part, just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph, but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered, but to have fought well.”
In removing the Games from Taiwan, the EAOC is directly contradicting the Olympic creed. The force imposed by Chinese officials on the committee resulted in it failing to fight well. Committee officials also evidenced no sort of struggle and ultimately denied young athletes around the region the chance to take part in an event in a historic setting.
What is more, according to the mayor of Taichung, which was to host the Games, the EAOC did not adhere to the contract it signed with the municipality. He alleged that the EAOC did not inform the city of any grounds for breaking the contract, nor did it allow for any sort of dispute resolution process prior to reneging on the deal. Clearly, this case passes the first test.
Regarding the second test: This is clearly a chance for Trump to stand up to Chinese influence, an opportunity he rarely misses. By calling out China for its continued attempts to verbally annex Taiwan, Trump can show supporters and opponents alike that he is capable of more than threatening tariffs.
He could also use this opportunity to paint himself in a more favorable light as an advocate of democracy. Republicans and Democrats have historically been fairly receptive to US efforts to shore up Taiwan’s burgeoning civic institutions.
There is also some precedent for Trump applying his doctrine to Taiwan. When then-president elect Trump took a telephone call with Tsai, he showed his willingness to frustrate China’s preference for US-Taiwan relations.
It is time for Trump to take his advocacy for Taiwan offline and into the political and economic realm.
Trump might not be able to restore the Games to Taiwan, but by protesting a bad deal, he can stem China’s increasing interference in Taiwanese affairs.
Kevin Frazier is a masters of public policy candidate at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government who visited Taiwan through the Mosaic Taiwan 2018 fellowship program.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry