After taking office in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has launched several charm offensives aimed at Taiwan, and his slogans about the two sides of the Taiwan Strait being a close family — or two brothers with a shared destiny whose blood is thicker than water — are still ringing in the ears of Taiwanese.
However, in the twinkling of an eye, Xi then sent Chinese fighter jets and warships to conduct drills that circled the nation and took away diplomatic allies, encroaching on the nation’s sovereignty and making every effort to suppress it, even interfering with Taichung’s right to host next year’s East Asian Youth Games.
Led by Xi, the Chinese leadership not only adopts carrot-and-stick tactics against Taiwan, it also says one thing and does another at home and abroad.
When Xi first took office, he used the excuse of fighting corruption to eliminate his political rivals and consolidate his power.
He then said that he was realizing “the Chinese dream of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” by abolishing presidential term limits and expanding his authoritarian rule.
He even started a personality cult, breaking away from the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) principle of having a centralized collective leadership and its doctrine of purging the party of the worship of individuals.
International relations experts often portray Xi’s foreign policy using the word “assertiveness,” saying his leadership style is to take the initiative by striking first.
Ostensibly, his “Chinese dream” is intended to build a wealthy, strong and civilized modern power, but he actually wants China to resume its historical position as the dominant power in Asia and create a modern tribute system.
Xi has repeatedly told the international community that China would never seek hegemony or engage in expansionism, but often also says that China’s diplomacy should display clear Chinese characteristics, and vows to play a more active role in global affairs, help define international rules and take part in global governance.
China has proposed various multinational economic and trade cooperation initiatives to boost its influence in international politics through economic means.
For example, the goal of the Belt and Road Initiative is to expand China’s influence all the way to Europe through South Asia and West Asia.
The establishment of international financial institutions, such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Silk Road Fund, is also a challenge to the international financial order and establishes new rules.
Moreover, Beijing in 2009 claimed that the South China Sea is a core Chinese interest, despite its call for “shelving disputes for joint development” in the region.
It has militarized islands and reefs in the area through large-scale construction since 2014, using a fait accompli strategy to change the “status quo” through maritime law enforcement, resource exploration and military exercises.
In cross-strait relations and international politics, Taiwan and the international community should pay more attention to what China does than what it says, because the examples of the CCP saying one thing and doing another are numerous.
China is using its influence to bully Taiwan and it wants to use “strategic clashes” to fight the push for independence and achieve strategic attrition to create a new “status quo” that will promote unification.
This also highlights the legitimacy crisis of the CCP’s rule: Beijing’s increased pressure on Taiwan is just a response to the domestic questioning of and challenge to its legitimacy.
Masao Sun is a former diplomat.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs